Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Pathol. 2014 Jan 31;45(6):1130–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.01.013

Table 2.

Differentially expressed miRNA in CCPRCC compared with normal matched tissue with log FC >2 and FDR <5%

miRNA logFC P FDR Proposed function Selected validated targets a Reported elsewhere
miR-210 4.26 4.46 × 10−4 5.38E-04 Hypoxamir ISCU, HIF1A, MNT [19]
miR-34a 2.75 1.06 × 10−2 2.01E-03 Oncosuppressor AKT1, PTEN, c-MYC [2]
miR-122 2.64 1.79 × 10−4 8.96E-03 Oncosuppressor CDKN2D, SMARCD1, CCND1 [2,19]
miR-21 2.47 4.06 × 10−2 5.43E-03 Oncogene PTEN, TIMP3, PDCD4 [2]
miR-34b* 2.20 3.81 × 10−3 1.15E-03 Oncosuppressor VEGFA, CREB1, c-MYC
miR-489 2.16 2.26 × 10−3 2.50E-02 Oncosuppressor SRC, COMP, GHRHR
miR-4284 −2.07 9.74 × 10−4 5.87E-04
miR-1202 −2.18 2.65 × 10−4 1.06E-02
miR-135a −2.24 2.22 × 10−4 1.03E-02 Oncosuppressor APC, JAK2, FLAP [20]
miR-1973 −2.61 2.11 × 10−3 2.44E-02
miR-204 −5.34 2.87 × 10−4 1.06E-02 Oncosuppressor VEGFA, RUNX2, E2F3 [2]
a

Experimentally proven gene targets listed in miRWalk and miRecords.