Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Math Biosci. 2011 Nov 19;235(2):128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.11.005

Table 3.

Comparison of the observed delay lengths according to the first clear troughs and the computed delay lengths. For subjects 6, 7 and 13, the time delays simulated are close to the time marks of the observed first clear troughs. There is no clear trough for the subject 8, while there are two clear troughs for the subject 27. The time delay fitted in simulation for subject 27 is between these two time marks but near to the second. The upper bounds of delays determined by Corollary 1 and 2 for subject 6 and 8 are also listed.

Subjects #6 #7 #8 #13 #27
Troughs 8 10 none 18 22
Delays 8.25 10.1688 6.24999 18 21.25
Upper bounds 15.5167 N.A. 49.2619 N.A. N.A.

“N.A.” for subject 7, 13 and 27 indicates that the conditions of both corollaries are not satisfied.