Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013 Oct 22;17(1):64–69. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2013.49

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards modeling of GC scores

Univariable HR (95% CI) P Multivariable HR (95% CI) P
GCa 1.62 (1.33–1.96) <0.001 GCa 1.40 (1.12–1.74) 0.003
Path Gleason Scoreb ≥8 2.55 (1.14–5.69) 0.023 Path Gleason Scoreb≥8 2.53 (0.94–6.83) 0.066
Pre-op PSAc (log2) 1.15 (0.75–1.77) 0.531 Pre-op PSAc (log2) 1.13 (0.78–1.64) 0.528
SVI 3.05 (1.36–6.85) 0.007 SVI 1.67 (0.62–4.47) 0.307
SM 0.55 (0.25–1.25) 0.157 SM 0.65 (0.27–1.59) 0.348
ECE 3.02 (1.31–6.96) 0.01 ECE 1.41 (0.59–3.38) 0.442
ttBCR 0.98 (0.749, 1.29) 0.9 ttBCR 1.11 (0.88,1.40) 0.365
LNI 5.22 (1.93–14.13) 0.001 LNI 0.59 (0.17–2.09) 0.417

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ECE, extra-capsular extension; GC, genomic classifier; LNI, lymph node involvement; SM, surgical margin; SVI, seminal vesicle invasion; ttBCR, time to biochemical recurrence.

a

Hazard ratio reported for 10% increase of GC score.

b

Pathological Gleason Score was dichotomized to compare Gleason Score ≥8 to Gleason Score ≤7.

c

Hazard ratio reported for 10% increase of log-transformed level.