Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Oct;163(10):944–948. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.160

Table 5.

Adjusted RRRs for Low and High vs Ambivalent Intention Group

Predictor Low Intention vs Ambivalent
Intention RRRa (95% CI)
High Intention vs Ambivalent
Intention RRRa (95% CI)
Abortion Attitudes Scale, z score 0.5 (0.3–0.9)b 0.7 (0.2–3.1)
Teen Sex Attitudes Scale, z score 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 1.7 (1.0–2.9)b
Attended teaching session that included EC 1.0 (0.2–4.0) 1.2 (0.6–2.2)
Preceptor ever encouraged EC prescription 1.0 (0.2–6.3) 6.1 (2.1–17.7)c
Adolescent patient ever requested EC 0.4 (0.2–0.6)c 1.2 (0.9–1.5)
No. of correct knowledge items 0.7 (0.5–0.9)c 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Continuity clinic has EC available to dispense 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 1.1 (0.8–1.6)

Abbreviations: See Table 4.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, postgraduate year, and all other variables in the Table. The EC ambivalent group serves as the referent.

b

P≤.05.

c

P≤.01.