Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 25;5(1):113–121. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0292-x

Table 2.

Comparison of alternative HLM models of walking speed

Model Interceptb Trials TXa_level TX_slope FUa_level FU_slope Reliability Deviance
A 60.846** 0.954 667.0
B 75.092** −1.410*** 0.986 591.6
C 75.430** −1.301*** −3.757* 0.986 586.4
D 74.947** −1.224*** −0.361** 0.987 588.1
E 74.156** −1.194*** 6.800 −0.802* 0.988 579.2
F 70.236*** 0.027 −1.273*** −24.769*** 0.988 541.8
G 69.023*** 0.268 −1.432*** −1.490*** 0.991 525.5
H 70.375*** −1.260*** −1.295*** 0.992 527.9

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

a TX treatment, FU follow-up

bIntercept represents the estimated average walking time at time zero, set at the first week of baseline. The variable trials represent each trial of the study, including baseline, treatment, and follow-up trials; statistically, trials represent the change in walking speed over time, not accounting for treatment. TX_slope is set at 0 during baseline and follow-up, and equal to trials during intervention phases; statistically, this variable represents the change in slope during intervention phases. TX_level is a dichotomous variable which represents the change in level of walking speed across intervention phases. FU_slope represents the change in slope during follow-up. FU_level represents the change in level of walking speed across follow-up observations