Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 22;41(2):400–410. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu103

Table 3.

Effect of Experimental Group Compared With Control Group on Outcome and Mediator Measures

Measure Time Effect SE P Value 95% CI N
Outcome
State paranoia factor Post 1 −0.00 0.13 .985 −0.26, 0.26 90
Post 2 −0.36 0.16 .028 −0.67, −0.04 92
Mediators
 Beads—85/15 Post 1 1.97 0.73 .008 0.52, 3.43 95
Post 2 1.17 1.03 .262 −0.89, 3.22 93
 Beads—60/40 Post 1 1.68 0.82 .045 0.04, 3.32 95
Post 2 1.86 0.87 .035 0.13, 3.59 93
 Possibility of being mistaken, yes/no Post 1 OR = 1.09 0.52 .850 0.43, 2.79 95
Post 2 OR = 4.10 2.28 .011 1.38, 12.17 92
 Alternative explanations Post 1 OR = 2.24 1.48 .222 0.62, 8.17 95
Post 2 OR = 2.90 1.58 .051 1.00, 8.45 93
 Possibility of being mistaken, % Post 1 4.02 5.16 .438 −6.23, 14.28 94
Post 2 9.71 5.01 .056 −0.25, 19.68 94
 Hypothetical contradiction Post 1 OR = 1.28 0.65 .621 0.48, 3.44 95
Post 2 OR = 0.96 0.51 .937 0.34, 2.71 92
Other symptom states
 Hallucination frequency–VAS Post 1 −4.80 19.34 .805 −43.53, 33.94 63
Post 2 −10.85 20.54 .600 −52.02, 30.32 61
 Hallucination Distress–VAS Post 1 −8.01 6.30 .209 −20.62, 4.60 64
Post 2 2.95 5.90 .619 −14.77, 8.87 62
 Anxiety–VAS Post 1 −0.47 5.05 .927 −10.51, 9.58 93
Post 2 −1.00 6.29 .874 −13.50, 11.50 93
 Depression–VAS Post 1 1.48 5.41 .785 −9.27, 12.24 93
Post 2 3.13 5.92 .599 −8.64, 14.89 93

Note: VAS, Visual Analog Scale.