Table 5.
Selection of DOE tools in analytical quality by design.
| Design | Number of variables and usage | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full factorial design |
Optimization/2–5 variables | Identifying the main and interaction effect without any confounding | Experimental runs increase with increase in number of variables |
|
| |||
| Fractional factorial design or Taguchi methods |
Optimization/and screening variables | Requiring lower number of experimental runs | Resolving confounding effects of interactions is a difficult job |
|
| |||
| Plackett-Burman method |
Screening/or identifying vital few factors from large number of variables | Requiring very few runs for large number of variables | It does not reveal interaction effect |
|
| |||
| Pseudo-Monte Carlo sampling (pseudorandom sampling) method |
Quantitative risk analysis/optimization | Behavior and changes to the model can be investigated with great ease and speed. This is preferred where exact calculation is possible | For nonconvex design spaces, this method of sampling can be more difficult to employ. Random numbers that can be produced from a random number generating algorithm |
|
| |||
| Full factorial design |
Optimization/2–5 variables | Identifying the main and interaction effect without any confounding | Experimental runs increase with increase in number of variables |