Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Mar;30(3):446–455. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2356

Table 3.

Comparison of site-specific analyses of Raman bone measurements. Raman spectra were averaged for new and preexisting tissue within each bone first based on calcein labeling and then using a broad definition of mid-cortical (old) versus endocortical (new) bone.

Repeated Measures 2-Way ANOVA ANOVA (within new tissue)
Factor: Age (Calcein label) BAPN BAPN

1660/1683 p < 0.001 p = 0.002 p = 0.001
1660/870 p = 0.001 p = 0.396 p = 0.266
1683/870 p = 0.004 p = 0.587 p = 0.529
958/1002 p < 0.0001 p = 0.415 p = 0.546
1070/958 p < 0.0001 p = 0.299 p = 0.610

Factor: Endo vs Mid Cortical BAPN

1660/1683 p <0.001 p = 0.392
1660/870 p = 0.005 p = 0.971
1683/870 p = 0.040 p = 0.959
958/1002 p = 0.091 p = 0.895
1070/958 p = 0.760 p = 0.108