Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan 30;63(2):251–257. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13242

Table 4. Prevalence rates and adjusted odds ratios for wheezing, respectively, according to spirometric category and age group.

Spiometric Category a N b No. (%) of participants with wheezing c Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) d
Age 40-80
 Normal 5,683 606 (10.7) 1.00
 Airflow-obstruction 892 218 (24.4) 2.50 (2.08, 3.00)
 Restrictive-pattern 434 83 (19.1) 1.53 (1.15, 2.04)
Age 40-64
 Normal 3,787 414 (10.9) 1.00
 Airflow-obstruction 516 131 (25.4) 2.35 (1.83, 3.01) e
 Restrictive-pattern 276 56 (20.3) 1.57 (1.10, 2.25) f
Age 65-80
 Normal 1,896 192 (10.1) 1.00
 Airflow-obstruction 376 87 (23.1) 2.85 (1.99, 4.07) e
 Restrictive-pattern 158 27 (17.1) 1.46 (0.89, 2.41) f

Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1-second; FVC, forced vital capacity; GLI, Global Lung Function Initiative; GLI-LLN5, lower limit of normal at the 5th percentile distribution, as defined by a GLI-calculated Z-score of -1.64; SD, standard deviation.

a

Normal spirometry was defined by FEV1/FVC and FVC, both ≥GLI-LLN5; airflow-obstruction by FEV1/FVC<GLI-LLN5; and restrictive-pattern by FEV1/FVC≥GLI-LLN5 and FVC<GLI-LLN5.

b

Varied from Table 1 because of missing data.

c

Percentage of the corresponding spirometric category.

d

Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression models, adjusted for age, height, sex, ethnicity, BMI, smoking history, high cardiovascular risk, and health status.

e

Not significantly different in the age group of 40-60 vs. 65-80 (p-value for age interaction was .822).

f

Not significantly different in the age group of 40-60 vs. 65-80 (p-value for age interaction was .936).