Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 8;8:87. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0671-2

Table 1.

Pre-treatment and Post-treatment female and male sand fly averages ± SE at sugar poor and sugar rich sites following ATSB applied to vegetation, bait stations, or untreated areas

Sites Female Male
Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pre-treatment Post-treatment
Sugar-poor
 Green vegetation 53.2 ± 17.2 1.5 ± 0.7 25.9 ± 7.5 1.8 ± 0.8
 Bait station 44.2 ± 14.3 2.7 ± 1.1 25.4 ± 7.4 1.8 ± 0.8
 Untreated 28.6 ± 9.3 59.8 ± 19.5 13.6 ± 3.9 33.7 ± 10.0
Sugar-rich
 Green vegetation 154.8 ± 49.9 2.2 ± 0.9 105.6 ± 30.2 11.0 ± 3.4
 Bait station 162.2 ± 52.4 7.8 ± 2.7 138.6 ± 42.4 6.3 ± 2.1
 Untreated 87.5 ± 28.3 113.1 ± 36.5 69.9 ± 20.1 113.3 ± 32.7