Table 2. Prognostic impact of staging procedures regarding PFS.
|
Single analysis of individual staging procedures |
Multiple analysis of individual staging procedures |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P | HR | 95% CI | P | |||
| Omentectomy
no vs yes |
2.00 |
1.24 |
3.21 |
0.004 |
1.81 |
1.03 |
3.21 |
0.041 |
| Peritoneal biopsy
no vs yes |
1.51 |
0.94 |
2.40 |
0.087 |
1.01 |
0.57 |
1.78 |
0.986 |
| Cytology no vs yes | 1.63 | 1.02 | 2.60 | 0.041 | 1.40 | 0.85 | 2.31 | 0.190 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio; PFS= progression-free survival. Statistically significant P values are highlighted in bold.