Table 6.
LD comparisons | N | (%) | D' | X2 | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G*01:01:01 | Del | 126 | 29.17 | 0.95 | 45.19 | <0.001 |
UTR1 | 44 | 10.19 | 0.80 | 37.70 | <0.001 | |
UTR4 | 33 | 7.64 | 0.64 | 19.97 | <0.001 | |
UTR6 | 45 | 10.42 | 0.94 | 47.47 | <0.001 | |
UTR20 | 6 | 1.39 | 1.00 | 5.93 | <0.05 | |
| ||||||
G*01:01:02 | Ins | 96 | 22.22 | 1.00 | 66.88 | <0.001 |
UTR2 | 96 | 22.22 | 1.00 | 98.49 | <0.001 | |
| ||||||
G*01:01:19 | Ins | 14 | 3.24 | 1.00 | 6.98 | <0.01 |
UTR2 | 14 | 3.24 | 1.00 | 10.27 | <0.01 | |
| ||||||
G*01:03:01 | Ins | 33 | 7.64 | 1.00 | 17.64 | <0.001 |
UTR5 | 33 | 7.64 | 1.00 | 189.72 | <0.001 | |
| ||||||
G*01:04:01 | Del | 17 | 3.94 | 1.00 | 4.16 | <0.05 |
UTR3 | 17 | 3.94 | 1.00 | 27.24 | <0.001 | |
| ||||||
G*01:04:04 | Del | 78 | 18.06 | 1.00 | 24.37 | <0.001 |
UTR3 | 78 | 18.06 | 1.00 | 159.40 | <0.001 | |
| ||||||
G*01:05N | Ins | 33 | 7.64 | 1.00 | 17.64 | <0.001 |
UTR2 | 33 | 7.64 | 1.00 | 25.98 | <0.001 | |
UTR7 | 1 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 5.83 | <0.05 | |
| ||||||
Del | +3003 C | 44 | 10.19 | 1.00 | 11.94 | <0.01 |
+3010 G | 148 | 34.26 | 1.00 | 65.44 | <0.001 | |
+3035 C | 245 | 56.71 | 1.00 | 7.30 | <0.05 | |
+3142 C | 148 | 34.26 | 1.00 | 65.44 | <0.001 | |
+3187 G | 51 | 11.81 | 1.00 | 14.23 | <0.001 | |
+3196 C | 245 | 56.71 | 1.00 | 126.48 | <0.001 | |
| ||||||
Ins | +3003 T | 187 | 43.29 | 1.00 | 4.78 | <0.05 |
+3010 C | 187 | 43.29 | 1.00 | 60.58 | <0.001 | |
+3035 T | 38 | 8.80 | 1.00 | 20.71 | <0.001 | |
+3142 G | 187 | 43.29 | 1.00 | 60.58 | <0.001 | |
+3187 A | 187 | 43.29 | 1.00 | 6.44 | <0.01 | |
+3196 G | 149 | 34.49 | 1.00 | 136.23 | <0.001 |
N: the number of individuals; D’: measure of linkage disequilibrium; X2: Chi-Square value from which the P-value was determined significant at P<0.05.