Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;9:79. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00079

Table 4.

Prefrontal EEG asymmetry in different attachment groups.

Study N Participants Gender Attachment measures
Infants Davidson and Fox (1989) 13 13 infants Mixed Periods of maternal approach and separation
Fox et al. (1992) 46 (1) 33 infants Mixed (1) Separation responses at 12 and 24 months of age
(2) 13 infants (2) longitudinal separation distress
Dawson et al. (1992, 2001) 26 26 mothers (12 with elevated depressive symptoms) and their infants Mixed Strange situation
Calkins and Fox (1992) 52 52 infants Mixed Strange situation; assessment of temperament and inhibition
Calkins et al. (1996) 207 207 mothers and their infants Mixed Visual, auditory, olfactory stimuli; infant behavior questionnaire; toddler behavior questionnaire; free play
Hane and Fox (2006) 185 185 infants (61 control, 67 high degrees of negative reactivity, 57 high degrees of positive reactivity Mixed Reactivity paradigm; laboratory temperament assessment battery; early social communication scale; maternal caregiving behavior during routine activities in the home
Children Davis O’hara (2003) 67 67 children (5–7 years) Mixed CBQa; separation anxiety test, three stimulus situations (post-maternal separation, happy/sad and separation/reunion)
Adolescents White et al. (2012) 23 13 secure, 10 dismissing Mixed CAIb; cyberball social exclusion task; need threat scale
White et al. (2013) 23 13 secure, 10 dismissing Mixed CAIb; cyberball social exclusion task; need threat scale
Escobar et al. (2013) 40 20 secure, 15 dismissing, 5 preoccupied Mixed FFIc; modified dual valence task; sociodemographic questionnaire
Adults Stanley (2006) 124 124 college students Mixed AAPd; video clips of separation and reunion
Zilber et al. (2007) 44 44 undergraduate students Mixed ECRe; response to 60 images (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral)
Rognoni et al. (2008) 39 9 avoidant, 14 free, 9 preoccupied, 7 fearful Mixed Film stimuli with emotional content; relationship questionnaire; ECRe; adult attachment scale
Behrens et al. (2011) 3 Case study: 3 mothers and their infants Mixed AAIf; response to 100 images (positive, negative, neutral, personal)
Fraedrich et al. (2010) 16 16 mothers Female AAPd; presentation of pictures which show infant faces expressing a positive, negative and neutral emotion
Chavis and Kisley (2012) 42 14 avoidant, 12 anxious, 15 secure Mixed ECRe; response to 45 images (positive, negative, neutral)
Weisman et al. (2012) 65 65 adults: new parents, new lovers and romantically unattached singles Mixed Response to images of a familiar/unfamiliar infant face and neutral stimuli
Dan and Raz (2012) 50 50 undergraduate students Mixed ECRe; response to images of angry and neutral faces
Verbeke et al., 2014 35 35 undergraduate students Female Attachment styles questionnaire; task-free resting-state under condition Ag and condition Bh

aCBQ, child behavior questionnaire; bCAI, child attachment interview; cFFI, friends and family interview; dAAP, adult attachment projective picture system; eECR, experiences in close relationships; fAAI, adult attachment interview; gcondition A, participants sit isolated in a dimly lit EEG lab; hcondition B, two participants sit together in a dimly lit EEG lab.