Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;6:162. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00162

Table 3.

Frequency of favorite decks reported by participants in each WM load group.

Group Favorite deck
Sum
A B C D
No WM load group 6 5 7 12 30
Low WM load group 7 5 6 12 30
High WM load group 5 3 8 14 30
Sum 18 13 21 38 90