Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 10;17(3):195–201. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12332

Table 3.

Risk for bias in studies comparing the outcomes of percutaneous needle aspiration (PNA) and percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) in the management of liver abscess

Studies Sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of outcome assessment Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting
Rajak et al.17 Uncertain High risk Uncertain Uncertain High risk High risk
Yu et al.18 Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Zerem & Hadzic19 Low risk Low risk Uncertain Uncertain High risk High risk
Singh et al.20 Low risk Low risk Uncertain Uncertain Low risk Low risk
Singh et al.21 Low risk Low risk Uncertain Uncertain Low risk High risk

Risk for bias was classified as low, uncertain or high. The detail of each grade is referred to in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.15