Table 1.
Measure | Sensitive period (PN1–9)
|
Conditional sensitive period (PN10–15)
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Saline | CORT increase (systemic or intra-amygdala CORT) | Saline | CORT reduction (maternal presence, adrenalectomy, amygdala CORT receptor blocker) | |
Behavior | Preference | Aversion | Aversion | Preference |
Corticosterone level | Low | High | High | Low |
2-DG uptake | ||||
Olfactory bulb | Increase | No change | No change | Increase |
Anterior piriform cortex | Increase | No change | No change | Increase |
Posterior piriform cortex | No change | Increase | Increase | No change |
Amygdala | No change | Increase | Increase | No change |
Note. The table summarizes our understanding of the brain regions supporting sensitive period (PN1–9) odor preference learning and conditional sensitive period (PN10–15) odor aversion learning. Learned odor preferences during the sensitive period are associated with increased neural activity, as measured by 2-deoxyglucose uptake within the olfactory bulb and anterior piriform “olfactory” cortex. There is no significant activity within the amygdala or posterior piriform cortex. In contrast, when CORTis high endogenously (PN12) or via treatment (PN8), learned odor aversions are associated with significant activity within the amygdala and posterior piriform cortex. Maternal presence during odor-shock conditioning in PN12 pups decreases CORT levels, increases neural activity within the olfactory bulb and anterior piriform “olfactory” cortex, inhibits posterior piriform cortex and amygdala responsivity, and permits odor preference learning. Note, this is the same neural circuitry responsible for PN8 preference learning (Moriceau & Sullivan, 2006; Moriceau et al., 2006; Raineki, Shionoya, Sander, & Sullivan, 2009; Sullivan, Landers, et al., 2000). PN = postnatal day.