Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Nov;52(7):651–660. doi: 10.1002/dev.20482

Table 1.

Odor-Shock Conditioning in Rat Pups

Measure Sensitive period (PN1–9)
Conditional sensitive period (PN10–15)
Saline CORT increase (systemic or intra-amygdala CORT) Saline CORT reduction (maternal presence, adrenalectomy, amygdala CORT receptor blocker)
Behavior Preference Aversion Aversion Preference
Corticosterone level Low High High Low
2-DG uptake
 Olfactory bulb Increase No change No change Increase
 Anterior piriform cortex Increase No change No change Increase
 Posterior piriform cortex No change Increase Increase No change
 Amygdala No change Increase Increase No change

Note. The table summarizes our understanding of the brain regions supporting sensitive period (PN1–9) odor preference learning and conditional sensitive period (PN10–15) odor aversion learning. Learned odor preferences during the sensitive period are associated with increased neural activity, as measured by 2-deoxyglucose uptake within the olfactory bulb and anterior piriform “olfactory” cortex. There is no significant activity within the amygdala or posterior piriform cortex. In contrast, when CORTis high endogenously (PN12) or via treatment (PN8), learned odor aversions are associated with significant activity within the amygdala and posterior piriform cortex. Maternal presence during odor-shock conditioning in PN12 pups decreases CORT levels, increases neural activity within the olfactory bulb and anterior piriform “olfactory” cortex, inhibits posterior piriform cortex and amygdala responsivity, and permits odor preference learning. Note, this is the same neural circuitry responsible for PN8 preference learning (Moriceau & Sullivan, 2006; Moriceau et al., 2006; Raineki, Shionoya, Sander, & Sullivan, 2009; Sullivan, Landers, et al., 2000). PN = postnatal day.