Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;56(2):1193–1207. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14948

Table 1.

Summary of EIV Regressions Performed on Total Accommodative Response as a Function of Total Accommodative Demand

Viewing Condition
Group
Meridian
Eye Condition
EIV Regression Model
Coefficient
Constant
R2
Binocular Controls 90° Better eye 0.91 −0.44 0.93
Worse eye 0.88 −0.32 0.91
180° Better eye 0.89 −0.46 0.93
Worse eye 0.93 −0.56 0.96
Amblyopes 90° Nonamblyopic eye 0.85 −0.35 0.77
Amblyopic eye 0.78 −0.10 0.65
180° Nonamblyopic eye 0.75 −0.26 0.76
Amblyopic eye 0.70 −0.06 0.66
Monocular Controls 90° Better eye 0.79 −0.27 0.83
Worse eye 0.86 −0.52 0.86
180° Better eye 0.80 −0.36 0.84
Worse eye 0.85 −0.51 0.84
Amblyopes 90° Nonamblyopic eye 0.74 0.12 0.80
Amblyopic eye 0.50 0.49 0.41
180° Nonamblyopic eye 0.68 0.05 0.78
Amblyopic eye 0.54 0.17 0.49

The coefficient, constant, and R2 values derived for each group (amblyopic or control), meridian (90° or 180°), and eye (better/nonamblyopic or worse/amblyopic) are listed.