Table 6.
a Estimated Impacts on Percentage Employed Subgroup: Boys, Age 12–20 Local Linear matching† | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age in 2002 |
BW | Avg Trt in 2002 |
Avg Con in 2002 |
1 Year DID Match |
2 Year DID Match |
1 Year DID |
2 Year DID |
% Obs in Support~ |
%Obs in Support~~ |
1 Year Obs T+C |
2 Year Obs T+C |
12–14 | .3 | 10 | 6 | −7.7 (2.7) | −12.4 (3.6) | −6.9 (2.4) | −13.4 (3.0) | 97 | 97 | 938 | 857 |
15–18 | .3 | 44 | 42 | 2.8 (5.9) | −5.1 (8.2) | 0.6 (4.4) | −6.8 (5.2) | 95 | 95 | 548 | 469 |
19–20 | .3 | 81 | 78 | −5.9 (9.9) | −15.4 (15.2) | 3.1 (6.1) | −6.0 (9.4) | 96 | 96 | 132 | 107 |
6–20 | .3 | 28 | 24 | −4.1 (2.6) | −10.3 (3.6) | −3.6 (2.1) | −10.8 (2.5) | 96 | 96 | 1618 | 1433 |
b Estimated Impacts on Percentage Employed Subgroup: Girls, Age 12–20 Local Linear matching† | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age in 2002 |
BW | Avg Trt in 2002 |
Avg Con in 2002 |
1 Year DID Match |
2 Year DID Match |
1 Year DID |
2 Year DID |
% Obs in Support~ |
%Obs in Support~~ |
1 Year Obs T+C |
2 Year Obs T+C |
12–14 | .3 | 10 | 5 | 0.7 (2.6) | −1.0 (2.8) | 0.3 (1.9) | −1.1 (2.4) | 97 | 97 | 886 | 787 |
15–18 | .3 | 27 | 18 | −10.5 (6.5) | 0.4 (9.2) | −5.8 (4.1) | 0.2 (5.0) | 97 | 97 | 562 | 452 |
19–20 | .3 | 32 | 22 | −5.0 (8.0) | 8.7 (23.6) | −4.9 (7.5) | −0.3 (9.9) | 95 | 96 | 116 | 92 |
6–20 | .3 | 17 | 11 | −3.8 (2.7) | 0.2 (3.8) | −2.3 (1.8) | −0.6 (2.2) | 97 | 97 | 1564 | 1331 |
Difference-in-Difference estimator, imposing common support (2% trimming)
Standard errors based on bootstrap with 500 replications
Percentage of observations in the support region for 1-year estimations
Percentage of observations in the support region for 2-year estimations
Difference-in-Difference estimator, imposing common support (2% trimming)
Standard errors based on bootstrap with 500 replications
Percentage of observations in the support region for 1-year estimations
Percentage of observations in the support region for 2-year estimations