Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;14:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-14-10

Table 3.

Estimated means of energy, total, animal and plant protein intakes, and energy percentage of protein intakes of adolescents participating in the in HELENA-CSS stratified by gender, age, tanner and BMI category

Characteristics N Energy (kcal/d) Total protein (g/d) Total protein (g/(kg.d)) Animal protein (g/d) Plant protein (g/d) Total protein Plant protein
% energy contributing to total energy intake
Mean intake (SD)
Total 1804 2450 (637) 96 (28) 1.7 (0.6) 58 (23) 38 (13) 15.8 (2.8) 6.2 (1.3)
Gender
 Males 855 2792 (655) 110 (29) 1.9 (0.6) 66 (24) 43 (13) 15.9 (3.0) 6.2 (1.3)
 Females 949 2141 (428)* 83 (20)* 1.6 (0.5)* 50 (18)* 33 (10)* 15.6 (2.7) 6.3 (1.3)
Age
 12.5-14.9 y 1032 2358 (637) 94 (28) 1.8 (0.6) 57 (22) 37 (12) 16.1 (2.9) 6.2 (1.4)
 15.0-17.5 y 772 2752 (713)** 98 (29)** 1.6 (0.5)** 58 (23) 39 (12)** 15.4 (2.8)** 6.2 (1.2)
Weight status
 Underweight 142 2443 (631) 94 (28) 2.2 (0.7) 56 (21) 39 (12) 15.5 (2.7) 6.3 (1.2)
 Normal weight 1383 2458 (635) 96 (28)a 1.8 (0.6)a 58 (22) 38 (13) 15.7 (2.8) 6.2 (1.3)
 Overweight 222 2397 (636) 96 (29)ab 1.4 (0.4)ab 59 (24) 37 (11) 16.2 (3.0)b 6.2 (1.3)
 Obesity 57 2476 (701) 102 (33)abc 1.2 (0.4)ab 63 (27) 38 (12) 16.5 (3.1)b 6.2 (1.2)

SD, standard deviation.

*Mean value was significantly different between males and females by Student T- test (P < 0.05).

**Mean value was significantly different from the young group (12.5-14.9 y) by Student T- test (P < 0.05).

aMean value was significantly different from underweight by ANOVA, (P < 0.05, Bonferroni correction.

bMean value was significantly different from normal weight by ANOVA, (P < 0.05, Bonferroni correction).

cMean value was significantly different from overweight by ANOVA, (P < 0.05, Bonferroni correction).