Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 19;10(2):e0118305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118305

Table 2. Group comparison between happy and unhappy indigenous peoples (N = 2,200).

Explanatory variables Unhappy (n = 297) Happy (n = 1,903) X2/t-test
Social exclusion domains
Medical benefits 14.82***
  no need 0.17 0.24
  not excluded 0.44 0.47
  excluded 0.39 0.29
Housing benefits 25.85***
  no need 0.13 0.25
  not excluded 0.22 0.24
  excluded 0.65 0.51
Child and youth benefits 3.78
  no need 0.36 0.31
  not excluded 0.27 0.28
  excluded 0.37 0.41
Senior benefits 3.39
  no need 0.42 0.45
  not excluded 0.19 0.15
  excluded 0.39 0.40
Unemployment benefits 17.60***
  no need 0.51 0.64
  not excluded 0.17 0.11
  excluded 0.32 0.25
Financial assistances 86.86***
  no need 0.14 0.42
  not excluded 0.08 0.06
  excluded 0.78 0.52
Socio-demographic characteristics
Gender 1.07
 Male 0.47 0.44
 Female 0.53 0.56
Age (42.33±12.26) a 46.55±11.12 a 41.67±12.30 a 6.43 b ***
 under 55 years 0.77 0.85 9.31**
 over 55 years 0.23 0.15
Educational level 75.08***
 Elementary or lower 0.34 0.21
 Junior high school 0.24 0.20
 Senior high school 0.12 0.13
 Vocational school 0.16 0.24
 College or higher 0.14 0.22
Health status
 Physical health status (good) 0.24 0.48 63.65*
 Mental health problem (yes) 0.94 0.74 60.12*
Other external factors
Household income 2.89±2.79 a 4.41±3.32 a -7.47 b ***
Religion 6.49**
 Protestant 0.37 0.42
 Catholic 0.22 0.24
 Buddhist, or other 0.41 0.34
Geographic Region 12.53**
 Remote mountain area 0.12 0.15
 Highlands area 0.37 0.41
 Plains area 0.51 0.44

*p<.05;

**p<.01;

***p<.001;

aBrackets is the standard deviation;

bT-test for continuous variable.