TABLE 2.
Analysis of NBL1 mutants via luciferase reporter assay
Luciferase reporter assay was performed with 1 nm BMP2.
NBL1 mutant | IC50 | Log[IC50(m)] ± S.E.a | Significanceb | Reductionc | Increased |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nm | fold | ||||
WT | 177 | −6.75 ± 0.17 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
ΔC | 159 | −6.80 ± 0.12 | NSe | 0.66 | 1.52 |
W34A | 3900 | −5.41 ± 0.60 | Yesf | 4.16 | 0.24 |
Y66A | 650 | −6.32 ± 0.21 | Yesg | 3.42 | 0.29 |
L60A | 160 | −6.94 ± 0.10 | NS | 0.84 | 1.19 |
L79A | 170 | −6.84 ± 0.10 | NS | 0.89 | 1.12 |
A58F | 70 | −7.20 ± 0.12 | Yesf | 0.37 | 2.71 |
S67Y | 22 | −7.79 ± 0.08 | Yesf | 0.12 | 8.64 |
A58F/S67Y | 27 | −7.49 ± 0.07 | Yesf | 0.14 | 7.04 |
a S.E., standard error of the mean. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
b Significance measured using Student's t test against WT.
c Represents fold decrease in BMP2 inhibition (WT/mutant).
d Represents fold increase in BMP2 inhibition (mutant/WT).
e NS, not significant.
f p value of 0.05.
g p value of 0.1.