Table 1.
Combined pituitary and dynamic function tests at diagnosis
Serum | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 min | 20 min | 60 min | 120 min | Impression | 0 min | 30 min | 0 min | 30 min | ||
Anterior pituitary | ||||||||||
GNRH stimulation test | ||||||||||
FSH | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.0 | – | 3.9 | – | 1.0 | – | ||
LH | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | – | 0.7 | – | 0.4 | – | ||
Oestradiol | a | – | – | – | 18 | – | – | – | ||
SHBG | 123.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Testosterone | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8 | – | ||
With Tanner stage 3 breast development, this GNRH test suggests pubertal arrest | ||||||||||
GH stimulation test | ||||||||||
GH | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | – | – | 0.2 | – | ||
IGF1 | 77 | – | – | – | 48 | – | 96 | – | ||
Low IGF1 along with peak GH <5.5 suggests growth hormone deficiency | ||||||||||
Synacthen test | ||||||||||
Cortisol | 158 | 282 | 360 | – | b 55 | b 229 | 68 (random) | |||
ACTH | 10.5 (0900 h) | – | – | – | b 5.8 (0000 0.25 h) | – | – | – | ||
Adrenal insufficiency with a relatively normal ACTH | ||||||||||
TRH test | ||||||||||
TSH | 2.65 | 8.68 | 13.15 | – | 1.8 | – | 0.36 | – | ||
FT4 | 8.3 | – | – | – | 8.7 | – | 9.4 | – | ||
FT3 | 3.73 | – | – | – | 2.7 | – | – | – | ||
Hypothalamic response to TRH suggests central hypothyrodism | ||||||||||
Prolactin | 1034 | – | – | – | Raised | 2207 | – | 424 | – | |
Posterior pituitary | ||||||||||
Plasma osmolality | 300 | – | – | – | b 296 | – | 300 | – | ||
Urine osmolality | 301 | – | – | – | b 99 | – | 349 | – | ||
Sodium | 145 | – | – | – | Normal c | b 144 | – | 135 | – | |
Others c | ||||||||||
Plasma HbA1c | – | – | – | – | 109 | – | – | – | ||
Plasma random glucose | – | – | – | – | 9.5 | – | – | – | ||
Bone age | delay by 2 years |
Unrecordable.
Post-surgery.
Patient 2 had diabetes insipidus.