Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2015 Feb 12;13:55. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0419-y

Table 2.

ROC curve area comparison

*A. From a logistic regression analysis*
Biomarker	Transformation	AUC ^a	Standard error	95% Wald Confidence Limits		Probability ^b
Biomarker	Transformation	AUC ^a	Standard error	Lower	Upper	Probability ^b
NY-ESO-1	Raw	0.60	0.04	0.52	0.67	0.0102
CEA	Raw	0.79	0.03	0.74	0.85	<0.0001
CA125	Raw	0.70	0.03	0.63	0.77	<0.0001
CYFRA 21-1	Raw	0.69	0.04	0.62	0.76	<0.0001
4 Biomarker Model^c	Raw	0.83	0.03	0.78	0.88	<0.0001
*B. From a MoM analysis*
Biomarker	Transformation	AUC ^a	Standard error	95% Confidence Interval		Probability ^b
Biomarker	Transformation	AUC ^a	Standard error	Lower	Upper	Probability ^b
NY-ESO-1	Raw	0.60	0.04	0.52	0.67	0.01007
CEA	Raw	0.79	0.03	0.74	0.85	<0.0001
CA125	Raw	0.70	0.03	0.63	0.77	<0.0001
CYFRA 21-1	Raw	0.69	0.04	0.62	0.76	<0.0001
4 Biomarker Model^c	Raw	0.81	0.03	0.75	0.86	<0.0001

^aAUC.

^bProbability of difference to AUC = 0.5.

^c4 Biomarker model = NY-ESO-1, CEA, CA125, and CYFRA 21-1.