Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 13;11:237–245. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S77089

Table 3.

Meta-analysis results

Comparisons OR 95% CI P-value Heterogeneity
Effects model
I2 P-value
T vs C 1.18 1.08–1.28 0.0001 91% <0.00001 R
Gastric cancer 1.26 1.10–1.45 0.001 94% <0.00001 R
Bladder cancer 1.13 1.06–1.21 0.0005 63% 0.03 R
Others 0.97 0.81–1.16 0.75 62% 0.03 R
Asian 1.19 1.05–1.35 0.007 93% <0.00001 R
Caucasian 1.15 1.04–1.26 0.004 75% 0.0005 R
Mixed 1.44 1.14–1.81 0.002 NA NA
TT vs CC 1.36 1.14–1.62 0.0008 90% <0.00001 R
Gastric cancer 1.51 1.10–2.08 0.01 94% <0.00001 R
Bladder cancer 1.28 1.20–1.37 <0.00001 0% 0.57 F
Others 0.91 0.75–1.10 0.33 39% 0.16 F
Asian 1.37 1.03–1.82 0.03 92% <0.00001 R
Caucasian 1.32 1.10–1.59 0.003 73% 0.001 R
Mixed 2.17 1.32–3.59 0.002 NA NA
TC vs CC 1.29 1.17–1.44 <0.00001 85% <0.00001 R
Gastric cancer 1.39 1.19–1.63 <0.0001 87% <0.00001 R
Bladder cancer 1.23 1.17–1.30 <0.00001 0% 0.65 F
Others 0.98 0.68–1.41 0.90 77% 0.001 R
Asian 1.36 1.18–1.57 <0.0001 88% <0.00001 R
Caucasian 1.13 0.95–1.34 0.16 79% <0.0001 R
Mixed 1.70 1.05–2.77 0.03 NA NA
TT + TC vs CC 1.32 1.18–1.49 <0.00001 90% <0.00001 R
Gastric cancer 1.44 1.19–1.74 0.0002 92% <0.00001 R
Bladder cancer 1.25 1.19–1.31 <0.00001 0% 0.64 F
Others 0.98 0.69–1.38 0.90 77% 0.002 R
Asian 1.38 1.17–1.62 0.0001 92% <0.00001 R
Caucasian 1.18 1.00–1.40 0.05 80% <0.0001 R
Mixed 1.88 1.19–2.99 0.007 NA NA
TT vs CC + TC 1.15 1.02–1.30 0.02 83% <0.00001 R
Gastric cancer 1.22 0.99–1.49 0.06 89% <0.00001 R
Bladder cancer 1.13 1.07–1.20 <0.0001 0% 0.56 F
Others 0.95 0.79–1.14 0.57 0% 0.96 F
Asian 1.13 0.93–1.36 0.87 87% <0.00001 R
Caucasian 1.15 1.09–1.22 <0.00001 47% 0.08 F
Mixed 1.46 1.05–2.03 0.02 NA NA

Note: P-values in bold indicate nonsignificance.

Abbreviations: F, fixed; NA, not applicable; R, random; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.