Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Intercult Relat. 2015 Mar;45:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.007

Table 2.

Hierarchical Logistic Regressions Predicting “Americanized” Jamaican Cluster Membership

Predictor M SD B Wald χ2 p OR
Media
Step 1, χ2(1) = .05, ns
    Social Desirability - - .03 .05 .82 1.03
Step 2, χ2(3) = 12.76, p ≤ .01
    Gender - - −.24 .39 .53 .79
        Consume Local TV 4.27 1.07 −.64 11.38 .001 .53
    Consume U.S. TV 3.81 1.30 −.15 .70 .40 .86
Step 3, χ2(2) = 14.19, p ≤ .001
    Gender × Consume local TV - - .13 .05 .82 1.14
        Gender × Consume U.S. TV - - 3.10 6.64 .01 22.25
Sports
Step 1, χ2(1) = .05, ns
    Social Desirability - - .03 .05 .82 1.03
Step 2, χ2(3) = 19.36, p ≤ .001
        Gender - - −.89 4.59 .03 .41
        Consume Local Sports 3.49 1.44 −.72 14.80 .001 .49
    Consume U.S. Sports 2.83 1.57 −.04 .07 .79 .96
Step 3, χ2(2) = 1.20, ns
    Gender × Consume Local Sports - - .57 1.07 .30 1.77
    Gender × Consume U.S. Sports - - −.27 .21 .65 .77

Note. OR = odds ratio. Non-significant models are excluded from this table and significant individual predictors are bolded. Gender coded boys = 1, girls = −1. Homer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-fit tests indicated adequate model fit for all steps in above analyses, all ps > .05.