Table 3.
Comparison between the certified copy number concentrations and concentration estimated by ddPCR in the ERM-AD623 series. A droplet volume of 0.91 nL has been used to calculate the copy number concentration
| ERM-AD623 | Certified value (cp/μL) | U CRM | Average measured values (cp/μL), n = 8 | stdev | Δ m (cp/μL) | u m (cp/μL) | U Δ (cp/μL) | Significant bias | % difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f | 10 | 1.5 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | No | 12 |
| e | 104 | 10 | 87 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 14 | Yes | 16 |
| d | 1020 | 90 | 846 | 80 | 174 | 60 | 121 | Yes | 17 |
| c | 10,300 | 1000 | 8851 | 669 | 1449 | 602 | 1203 | Yes | 14 |
| b | 108,000 | 11,000 | 90,951 | 8105 | 17,049 | 6832 | 13,663 | Yes | 16 |
| a | 1,080,000 | 130,000 | 908,543 | 58,766 | 171,457 | 71,333 | 142,665 | Yes | 16 |
The calculated bias is significant with a confidence level of 95 %
U CRM expanded uncertainty of the certified value; Δ m absolute difference between mean measured value and certified value; U Δ combined uncertainty of result and certified value; u m uncertainty of the measurement result, calculated as the standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of replicates