Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;407(7):1831–1840. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8458-z

Table 3.

Comparison between the certified copy number concentrations and concentration estimated by ddPCR in the ERM-AD623 series. A droplet volume of 0.91 nL has been used to calculate the copy number concentration

ERM-AD623 Certified value (cp/μL) U CRM Average measured values (cp/μL), n = 8 stdev Δ m (cp/μL) u m (cp/μL) U Δ (cp/μL) Significant bias % difference
f 10 1.5 9 2 1 1 2 No 12
e 104 10 87 10 17 7 14 Yes 16
d 1020 90 846 80 174 60 121 Yes 17
c 10,300 1000 8851 669 1449 602 1203 Yes 14
b 108,000 11,000 90,951 8105 17,049 6832 13,663 Yes 16
a 1,080,000 130,000 908,543 58,766 171,457 71,333 142,665 Yes 16

The calculated bias is significant with a confidence level of 95 %

U CRM expanded uncertainty of the certified value; Δ m absolute difference between mean measured value and certified value; U Δ combined uncertainty of result and certified value; u m uncertainty of the measurement result, calculated as the standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of replicates