Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;15:12. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0174-5

Table 2.

Comparison between the groups (SWETZ × LLETZ-cone): surgical outcomes (IFF/Fiocruz - 2008–2011)

SWETZ %, range or SD * LLETZ-cone %, range or SD * ARR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) p-value
N 78 100 76 100 - - -
Blood loss (ml)
 <20 74 94.9 76 100 - -
 20-100 4 5.1 0 0 −5.1 (−10.0 – -0.2) - 0.1
Number of segments removed
 1 77 100 59 78.7 19.8 (10.3-29.3) - -
 >1 0 0 16 21.3 - - <0,01
 No data 1 - 1 - - -
Surgery time - minutes (median) 20 8-60 17 9-32 - - <0,01§
 ≤18 min 33 42.9 44 60.3 - - -
 >18 min 44 57.1 29 39.7 −16.3 (−32,2 – -0.4) 1.44 (1.02-2.03)
 No data 1 - 5 - - - -
Geometric ambition - mm (average) 30.92 6.31 30.54 6.15 - - 0,7||
Geometric ambition difference - mm (average)¶** 10.19 5.7 10.62 5.5 - - 0,7||
Anesthetic volume – ml 8.26 1.95 8.04 1.8 - - 0,5||
 No data 11 - 15 - - - -
Complications 2‡‡ 2.6 2†† 3 0.1 (−5.0-5.1) 0.97 (0.14-6.74) 1

*Cases with no data were excluded.

Fisher's Exact test.

Chi-square.

§Mann–Whitney test.

||Student's t-test.

The ones unfilled of ambition or without histological measure were excluded.

**Difference between the desired extension (endo + ecto) and what was effectively measured in the specimen.

††Opening of the vaginal mucosa and the need for anesthetic supplementation.

‡‡Opening of the lateral vaginal cul-de-sac with vascular injury, requiring total hysterectomy and need for general anesthesia.