. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 22.

Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Feb;27(2):234–245. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00717

Table 2.

Correlation Matrix

	Trails A	Trails B	DSST	CVLT	LM	Face–scene	SR	Animals	Fruits & Veg	SPWM	Task-switch	n-back
Trails A	–	.65^***	.58^***	.17	.17	.13	.27^**	.18	.06	.29^**	.26^**	.16
Trails B		–	.65^***	.22^*	.28^**	.28^**	.41^***	.20	.12	.45^***	.25^**	.20^*
DSST			–	.18	.23^*	.31^**	.43^***	.33^**	.16	.38^***	.13	.24^*
CVLT				–	.28^**	.24^*	.39^***	.18	.23^*	.19^*	.10	.13
LM					–	.24^*	.29^**	.13	.11	.05	.05	.14
Face–scene						–	.34^***	.15	−.01	.28^**	.11	.12
SR							–	.19^*	.12	.26^**	.02	.19
Animals								–	.68^***	.16	.05	.22^*
Fruits & Veg									–	.04	−.03	.11
SPWM										–	.31^**	.31^**
Task-switch											–	.23^*
n-back												–

Fruits & Veg = fruits and vegetables; SPWM = spatial working memory task.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.