Table 3.
Participation in centre activities and extent of goal attainment
| Whole sample | Information (IC) | Goal-setting (GS) | Goal-setting with mentoring (GM) | Between-group statistical comparison (Kruskal-Wallis ~ or Fisher’s Exact Test) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 75 | N = 27 | N = 24 | N = 24 | |||
| Mean (SD, range) | Mean (SD, range) | Mean (SD, range) | Mean (SD, range) | Kruskal-Wallis | P | |
| Centre activities undertaken | 2.70 (2.50; 0–13) | 2.78 (2.26; 0–10) | 2.38 (2.16; 0–8) | 2.91 (3.01; 0–13) | .66 | |
| Sessions attended | 34.00 (35.62; 0–131) | 29.07 (35.04; 0–126) | 36.34 (38.84; 0–131) | 37.50 (37.10; 0–117) | .61 | |
| Sessions by type | ||||||
| Cognitive | 11.54 (11.03; 1–43) | 6.33 (7.66; 1–30) | 14.00 (13.03; 1–43) | 14.93 (11.02; 1–35) | .07 | |
| Physical | 29.60 (26.97; 1–109) | 22.00 (20.85; 1–78) | 34.85 (29.98; 2–109) | 36.72 (31.55; 1–84) | .27 | |
| Art and Craft | 20.55 (22.32; 1–76) | 22.00 (26.61; 1–76) | 20.00 (23.35; 3–66) | 19.30 (20.08; 1–60) | .92 | |
| Number of goals set | 2.85 (1.2; 1–5, n = 48) | - | 2.83 (1.09; 1–5) | 2.88 (1.33; 1–5) | .99 | |
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | X 2 (FET) | p | |
| Goal attainment1 | ||||||
| <25% | 31 (22.6) | - | 15 (21.7) | 16 (23.5) | 5.29 | .26 |
| 25% | 9 (6.6) | 7 (10.1) | 2 (2.9) | |||
| 50% | 19 (13.9) | 6 (8.7) | 13 (19.1) | |||
| 75% | 22 (16.1) | 11 (15.9) | 11 (16.2) | |||
| 100% | 39 (28.5) | 20 (29.0) | 19 (27.9) | |||
1. The process of goal-setting included specification of what level of behavioural change would constitute 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% goal attainment. At follow-up, alongside participants’ ratings of performance and satisfaction, the extent of goal attainment was rated for each goal.
2. ~ SPSS v. 20 does not provide values for H but simply reports on whether or not the null hypothesis should be retained, with p values.