Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;6:107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00107

Table 3.

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses: dispersion and processing in phase 2 predicting therapy outcome variables.

B SE β t p R2 ΔR2 ΔF p ΔF
SCID-II
Step 1 0.07 0.07 1.77 0.196
SCID-II pre 0.42 0.32 0.27 1.33 0.196
Step 2 0.49 0.42 8.77** 0.002
SCID-II pre 0.37 0.25 0.24 1.50 0.149
Dispersion 2 -3.59 1.69 -0.35 -2.13* 0.046
Processing 2 -1.92 0.71 -0.45 -2.72* 0.013
Negative Pattern
Step 1 0.03 0.03 0.62 0.438
Negative pre 0.19 0.24 0.16 0.79 0.438
Step 2 0.12 0.10 1.16 0.333
Negative pre 0.19 0.24 0.16 0.81 0.429
Dispersion 2 -1.12 0.99 -0.27 -1.23 0.231
Processing 2 -0.19 0.42 -0.10 -0.45 0.658
Positive Pattern
Step 1 0.24 0.24 7.05* 0.014
Positive pre 0.78 0.30 0.48 2.66* 0.014
Step 2 0.65 0.42 12.72*** 0.000
Positive pre 0.40 0.22 0.25 1.81 0.085
Dispersion 2 2.51 0.92 0.39 2.73* 0.013
Processing 2 1.27 0.38 0.46 3.73** 0.003

SCID-II = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; 2 = phase 2 (sessions 11-34); Negative = Personality Disorder Pattern; Positive = Positive Pattern; Pre = Baseline; Post = Posttreatment. *p < 0.05, ** p <0.01, ***p < 0.001.