Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;57(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0094-2

Table 1.

Studies showing relationship between surface (measured by infrared devices) and ambient temperature in healthy pigs

Source N Breed Approx. weight (kg) Surface area(s) Thermal Window (X: yes) T ambient [°C] Regression Constant, T 0 [°C] ( A ) Regression coefficient, b ( A ) Correlation (r) and goodness of fit (R 2 ) ( A ) Remarks
Henken et al. [30] 16 Norwegian, Finnish and Dutch Landrace and Great Yorkshire 26 Lumbal area 11-26 22.5–25.9 0.37–0.47 r = 0.83–0.91 (**) (B)
Wendt et al. [34] 89 7–60 Ear base X 12–30 28.5 0.263 r = −0.68 (***) (C)
147 160–222 27.6
Loughmiller et al. [2] 4 Crossbred 30 Loin 10–32 24.8 0.40 R2 = 0.97 (***)
Collin et al. [35] 8 [Large White × Landrace] × Piétrain 15–35 Interscapula region 23–33 29.3 0.29 (**) (B)
Savary et al. [36] 9 50–70 Ear base, abdomen (caudal) and upper medial side of legs X 12–18 30.6 0.36 (***)
Carpus, tarsus, shoulder, knee and elbow 25.2–27.1 0.48
Costa et al. [37] 12 8 Part of body with the highest temperature X 22–36 30.8 0.20 R2 = 0.44 (***)
11 X 16–28 33.7 0.20 R2 = 0.57 (***)
Malmkvist et al. [31] 39 Danish Landrace × Yorkshire >200 Eye X 15–25 32 0.2 (***) (B)
Snout 28.7 0.3
Udder (caudal) X 32 0.2

ATskin = T0 + b*Tambient , where T0 = regression constant [°C], b = regression coefficient ( = Tskin increase per 1°C increase in Tambient). **:P < 0.01 and ***:P < 0.001.

BEstimations performed by author of this article.

CBased on thermocouple temperature measurements, not IR.