Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Mar 1;7(1):17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2014.11.013

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Validation of ECGI in patients undergoing intraoperative cardiac mapping (sinus rhythm). Invasive (red) and noninvasive ECGI reconstructed (black) QRS epicardial electrograms from corresponding positions on anterior RV (framed numbers) are shown side by side. Correlation coefficients (CC) are provided for each pair. The intraoperative recording patch boundaries and electrode positions are marked on the heart image. Similar results were obtained for posterior LV. RV, right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; AV, atrialventricular. (From Ghanem RN, Jia P, Ramanathan C, Ryu K, Markowitz A, Rudy Y. Noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI): comparison to intraoperative mapping in patients. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:339–354; with permission.)