. 2015 Feb 4;226(3):215–223. doi: 10.1111/joa.12282

Table 3.

Bite force at the incisor, premolar and third molar predicted by models with altered muscle load magnitudes. Percentage difference from bite force of original models (given in Table1) calculated

	Bite force (N)			% difference
	I	PM	M3	I	PM	M3
SM +20%	1469	3150	4391	± 5.76	± 5.56	± 5.41
SM −20%	1309	2818	3940	± 5.76	± 5.56	± 5.41
DM +20%	1447	3109	4339	± 4.16	± 4.19	± 4.17
DM −20%	1331	2859	3992	± 4.16	± 4.19	± 4.17
IOZM +20%	1465	3147	4391	± 5.52	± 5.47	± 5.41
IOZM −20%	1312	2821	3940	± 5.52	± 5.47	± 5.41
T + 20%	1391	2989	4171	± 0.18	± 0.15	± 0.14
T −20%	1386	2980	4160	± 0.18	± 0.15	± 0.14
MP +20%	1413	3043	4256	± 1.77	± 1.97	± 2.16
MP −20%	1364	2925	4075	± 1.77	± 1.97	± 2.16

I, incisor; PM, premolar; M3, third molar; SM, superficial masseter; DM, deep masseter; IOZM, infraorbital zygomaticomandibularis; T, temporalis; MP, medial pterygoid.