Table 3.
Multivariable regression models showing the associations of lifetime measures of continuous absolute and comparative perceived risk of type 2 diabetes with modelled risk, risk factors (n = 530), and theory-based antecedents of behaviour change (n = 521).
| Continuous absolute (1–100)a
|
Comparative (1–5)b
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | p-Value | β | 95% CI | p-Value | |
| Modelled risk and risk factors (Model 1) | ||||||
| Framingham Offspring Study Diabetes Risk Score (%) | 0.19 | 0.09–0.30 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 0.01–0.03 | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | Removed from model | Removed from model | ||||
| VO2 max (ml/kg/min) | Removed from model | Removed from model | ||||
| Body fat percentage (%) | 0.44 | 0.22–0.66 | <0.001 | 0.05 | 0.03–0.07 | <0.001 |
| Self-reported weight (kg) | Removed from model | Removed from model | ||||
| Self-rated health good or excellent (yes) | −9.55 | −15.04 to −4.05 | <0.01 | −1.01 | −1.46 to −0.55 | <0.001 |
| Psychological factors (Model 2)c | ||||||
| Worry | 5.98 | 5.04–6.92 | <0.001 | 0.48 | 0.37–0.58 | <0.001 |
| Anxiety | Removed | from model | 0.02 | 0.00–0.03 | <0.05 | |
| Intention | ||||||
| Physical activity | Removed from model | Removed from model | ||||
| Diet | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Response efficacy | ||||||
| Physical activity | −3.52 | −6.31 to −0.72 | <0.05 | Removed from model | ||
| Diet | Removed from model | −0.51 | −0.76 to −0.25 | <0.001 | ||
| Self efficacy | ||||||
| Physical activity | −4.54 | −6.47 to −2.60 | <0.001 | −0.61 | −0.80 to −0.42 | <0.001 |
| Diet | – | – | – | Removed from model | ||
CI: confidence interval.
a
Values were calculated using linear regression.
b
Values were calculated using ordered logistic regression.
c
Values are adjusted for age and sex.