Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 1;20(2):113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.10.001

Table 4.

Univariate analysis for 5-year bDFS of two different groups: patients treated with and without hormonal therapy (HT).

Patients treated with HT 148 pts (52%)
Patients treated without HT 134 pts (48%)
5-year bDFS % (95% CI) p value* 5-year bDFS % (95% CI) p value*
PSA cut-off
<0.2 ng/ml ART 64% (95% CI 17–89) 0.22 89% (95% CI 78–94) 0.19
≥0.2 ng/ml SRT 66% (95% CI 55–76) 74% (95% CI 58–85)
<0.02 ng/ml ART 64% (95% CI 17–89) 0.21 97% (95% CI 80–99) 0.13
≥0.02 ng/ml SRT 66% (95% CI 55–76) 76% (95% CI 65–84)



Risk class17
Low risk 84% (95% CI 65–93) 0.20 88% (95% CI 75–95) 0.12
Intermediate risk 67% (95% CI 45–81) 69% (95% CI 46–84)
High risk 55% (95% CI 34–71) 76% (95% CI 50–89)



Pathological N status
pN0 65% (95% CI 50–76) 0.0022 80% (95% CI 67–88) 0.28
pN1 35% (95% CI 9–62)
pNx 91% (95% CI 73–97) 87% (95% CI 74–94)



Pathological Gleason score
3–6 (61 pts, 22%) 93% (95% CI 59–99) 0.002 93% (95% CI 75–98) 0.13
7 (125 pts, 44%) 78% (95% CI 61–89) 81% (95% CI 68–89)
8–10 (96 pts, 34%) 45% (95% CI 27–62) 77% (95% CI 56–89)



Surgical margins
Positive 82% (95% CI 62–91) 0.22 83% (95% CI 70–96) 0.15
Negative 60% (95% CI 45–72) 82% (95% CI 72–89)
*

Log-rank test.