Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 18;20(2):99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.10.010

Table 2.

Mean integral dose ID (with standard deviations) delivered to body structure calculated for the group of 10 plans computed with four different irradiation techniques: IMRT, VMAT, CK and HT. ANOVA test showed that differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Irradiation technique Mean ID [Gy L] Std. Dev.
CK 81.59 24.71
VMAT (X-6MV) 54.01 12.31
VMAT (X-20MV) 49.81 10.35
IMRT (X-6MV) 69.38 16.63
IMRT (X-20MV) 61.07 15.07
HT 116.08 38.50