Table 3.
ACCORD | Look AHEAD | EXAMINE | SAVOR-TIMI 53 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects (n) | 10,251 | 5,145 | 5,380 | 16,492 |
Baseline characteristics | ||||
Age (years) | 62 | 59 | 61 | 65 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 32 | 36 | 29 | 31 |
Diabetes duration (years) | 10 | 5 | 7 | 10 |
Cardiovascular disease history (%) | 35 | 14 | 100 | 79 |
HbA1c (%) | 8.1 | 7.2 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Glucose-lowering therapy use | Int vs. Conv | Int lifestyle vs. Conv | Alogliptin vs. placebo | Saxagliptin vs. placebo |
Insulin (%) | 77 vs. 55 | 33 vs. 40b | 29 vs. 30e | 43 vs. 46g |
Metformin (%) | 95 vs. 87 | 67 vs. 67b | 65 vs. 67e | 70 vs. 70g |
Sulfonylurea (%) | 78 vs. 68 | NR | 47 vs. 46e | 39 vs. 40g |
TZD (%) | 92 vs. 58 | NR | 2.4 vs. 2.5e | 4.7 vs. 4.7g |
Results | ||||
Duration of follow-up (years) | 3.5 | 9.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 |
HbA1c achieved (%) | 6.4 vs. 7.5 | Diff −0.22 Int vs. Convc | 7.7 vs. 8.1f | 7.5 vs. 7.8g |
Change in weight (kg) | 3.5 vs. 0.4 | Diff −4 Int vs. Convc | 1.1 vs. 1.0f | 0.6 vs. 1.0g |
Change in weight, Int or DPP-4 inhibitor vs. Conv or placebo (kg/year of follow-up) | 1.1 vs. 0.1 | −0.7 vs. −0.4 | 0.7 vs. 0.7 | 0.3 vs. 0.5g |
Primary cardiovascular (HR [95% CI]) | 0.90 [0.78–1.04] | 0.95 [0.83–1.09] | 0.96 [≤ 1.16] | 1.00 [0.89–1.12] |
Myocardial infarct (nonfatal) (HR [95% CI]) | 0.76 [0.62–0.92] | 0.86 [0.69–1.06] | 1.08 [0.88–1.33] | NR |
Myocardial infarct (fatal) (Event rate or HR [95% CI]) | 0.4% Int vs. 0.3% Conv | 0.44 [0.15–1.26] | NR | NR |
Myocardial infarct (all) (Event rate or HR [95% CI]) | 4.0% Int vs. 4.7% Conv | 0.84 [0.68–1.04] | NR | 0.95 [0.8–1.12] |
Heart failure (HR [95% CI]) | 1.18 [0.93–1.49]a | 0.80 [0.61–1.04]d | NR | 1.27 [1.07–1.51] |
Cardiovascular death (HR [95% CI]) | 1.35 [1.04–1.76] | 0.88 [0.62–1.29] | 0.79 [0.60–1.04] | 1.03 [0.87–1.22] |
All-cause mortality (HR [95% CI]) | 1.22 [1.01–1.46] | 0.85 [0.69–1.04] | 0.88 [0.71–1.09] | 1.11 [0.96–1.27] |
Comments | Obese group. Aggressive glucose lowering with high insulin and TZD use and high weight gain in Int group. | Obese group. Weight loss greater with lifestyle intervention. Not a study of intensive glucose lowering. | High risk subjects. Not a study of intensive glucose lowering, but alogliptin group had lower HbA1c. | High-risk subjects. Not a study of intensive glucose lowering, but saxagliptin group had lower HbA1c. Moderate use of insulin. |
ACCORD (42), Look AHEAD (64), EXAMINE (73), SAVOR-TIMI 53 (72). Conv, conventional treatment; Int, intensive treatment (glucose lowering in ACCORD; lifestyle in Look AHEAD); NR, not recorded. Bold typeface indicates significant changes.
Fatal and nonfatal heart failure.
At end of study.
Over course of study.
Hospitalization for heart failure.
At baseline.
At end of study.
At 2 years.