Table 1.
Authors | N | ER Family | Specific variable | T/A | Measure used | Facet | r | CI r (lower bound) | CI r (upper bound) | d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | SS | Situation selection | T | AES | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.63 | |
Ciarrochi et al., 2002 | 302 | SS | Daily hassles | T | EIS | −0.01 | −0.12 | 0.10 | −0.02 | |
Day et al., 2005 | 133 | SS | Daily hassles | T | EQ-I | AGS | −0.43 | −0.51 | −0.27 | −0.94 |
Kim and Agrusa, 2011 | 385 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | WLEIS | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.30 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | EIS | AGS | −0.08 | −0.22 | 0.06 | −0.16 |
Rogers et al., 2006 | 253 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | SREIT | −0.04 | −0.16 | 0.08 | −0.08 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TMMS-alex F1 | −0.16 | −0.24 | −0.08 | −0.32 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | modified EQ-i | −0.34 | −0.47 | −0.20 | −0.72 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study2 sample1) | 200 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.39 | −0.50 | −0.27 | −0.84 | |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.01 | −0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | |
MacCann et al., 2011 | 159 | SS | Avoidant coping | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.21 | −0.35 | −0.06 | −0.43 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | EQ-i | −0.23 | −0.32 | −0.13 | −0.47 | |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | SEIS | 0.01 | −0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | SS | Avoidant coping | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.26 | −0.34 | −0.18 | −0.54 | |
Petrides et al., 2006a | 37 | SS | Perseverance | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.53 | 0.25 | 0.74 | 1.25 | |
Dunn et al., 2007 | 84 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | MSCEIT | −0.19 | 0.06 | 0.62 | −0.38 | |
Dunn et al., 2007 | 84 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | SREIS | −0.09 | −0.39 | 0.02 | −0.18 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | SEI/SREIS/TEIQue | 0.22 | −0.30 | 0.13 | 0.45 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 1) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | JET+IJI | 0.36 | −0.01 | 0.41 | 0.77 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 0.56 | |
Hoerger et al., 2012 (study 2) |
81 | SS | Forecast accuracy | A | JET+IJI+STEU | 0.39 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.84 | |
Schutte et al., 2001b | 38 | SS | Persistence | T | SEIS | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.56 | 0.79 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SS | Behavioral disengagement | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | −0.24 | −0.35 | −0.12 | −0.49 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SS | Behavioral disengagement | A | MSCEIT | −0.16 | −0.28 | −0.04 | −0.32 | |
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005 | 365 | SS | Time to relax | T | TEIQ | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.95 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | SM | Modifying situations | T | EIS | 0.20 | −0.03 | 0.42 | 0.41 | |
Moradi et al., 2011 | 200 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.40 | 0.56 |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | modified EQ-i | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.67 | 1.38 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 2. sample 1) | 200 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 1.80 | |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 1.66 | |
MacCann et al., 2011 | 159 | SM | Problem-focused coping | A | MSCEIT | AGS | 0.14 | −0.02 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EIS | AGS | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | SREIS | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 1.31 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Problem-focused coping | A | MSCEIT | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.34 | |
Kluemper, 2008 | 180 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | WLEIS | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 1.54 | |
Rogers et al., 2006 | 253 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | SREIT | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.63 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.51 | 0.87 | |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.71 |
Saklofske et al., 2007 | 362 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EIS | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.82 | |
Almran and Punamaki, 2008 | 312 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | EQ-I:YV-S | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.51 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SM | Problem-focused coping | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.41 | |
Rahim and Minors, 2003 | 222 | SM | Problem solving | T | EQ-Index | AGS | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.54 | 0.98 |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SM | Direct confrontation | T | SEIS | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 0.95 | |
Montes-Berges and Augusto, 2007 | 119 | SM | Active coping | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.05 | −0.13 | 0.23 | 0.11 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SM | Active coping | T | EQ-I | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 0.82 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | SM | Active coping | T | SREIS | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.54 | 1.01 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | SM | Active coping | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.30 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Active coping + planning | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.40 | 0.28 | 0.51 | 0.87 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Active coping + planning | A | MSCEIT | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Problem Solving Inventory | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | −0.43 | −0.53 | −0.32 | −0.94 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Problem Solving Inventory | A | MSCEIT | −0.04 | −0.17 | 0.09 | −0.08 | |
Austin et al., 2010 | 475 | SM | Task-oriented coping | T | EQ:i-S | AGS | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
Saklofske et al., 2012 | 238 | SM | Task-oriented coping | T | EQ:i S | AGS | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.57 | 1.09 |
Kim and Agrusa, 2011 | 385 | SM | Task coping | T | WLEIS | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 1.28 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | SM | Rational coping | T | TEIQue-ASF | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 1.03 | |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | SM | Social support | T | SEIS | 0.36 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.77 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Instrumental social support | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.35 | 0.49 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Instrumental social support | A | MSCEIT | 0.06 | −0.07 | 0.19 | 0.12 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | SM | Support from others | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.21 |
Gerits et al., 2004 | 380 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EQ-i | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.43 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EIS | AGS | 0.07 | −0.08 | 0.21 | 0.13 |
Ciarrochi and Deane, 2001 | 300 | SM | Social support seeking | T | EIS | AGS | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | SM | Social support seeking | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.26 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Social support seeking | T | SREIS | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.67 | |
Goldenberg et al., 2006 | 223 | SM | Social support seeking | A | MSCEIT | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013 | 200 | SM | Conflict res. (constructive) | A | MSCEIT | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.49 | |
Zeidner and Kloda, 2013 | 200 | SM | Conflict res. (avoidance) | A | MSCEIT | −0.39 | −0.50 | −0.26 | −0.84 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (integrate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.35 | 0.25 | 0.44 | 0.74 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (avoid) | T | WEIP6 | −0.12 | −0.23 | −0.01 | −0.24 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2004 | 350 | SM | Conflict res. (dominate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.38 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (collaborate) | T | WEIP6 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.64 | 1.25 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (avoidance) | T | WEIP6 | −0.12 | −0.28 | 0.04 | −0.24 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict resolution (force) | T | WEIP6 | 0.02 | −0.15 | 0.19 | 0.04 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (accommodate) | T | WEIP6 | −0.08 | −0.24 | 0.08 | −0.01 | |
Jordan and Troth, 2002 | 139 | SM | Conflict res. (compromise) | T | WEIP6 | 0.09 | −0.08 | 0.25 | 0.02 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (confronting) | T | WLEIS | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.41 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (withdrawal) | T | WLEIS | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.24 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict resolution (forcing) | T | WLEIS | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.24 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (smoothe) | T | WLEIS | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.38 | |
Salami, 2010b | 320 | SM | Conflict res. (compromise) | T | WLEIS | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.43 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Restraint | T | TMMS+AES | 0.08 | −0.05 | 0.21 | 0.16 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | SM | Restraint | A | MSCEIT | −0.04 | −0.17 | 0.09 | −0.08 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | AD | Attention deployment | T | EIS | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.56 | 0.82 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | AD | Mental disengagement | T | TMMS+AES | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | AD | Mental disengagement | A | MSCEIT | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | AD | Trait distraction | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 0.89 | |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | AD | State distraction | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.77 |
Saklofske et al., 2012 | 238 | AD | Distraction | T | EQ-i: S | −0.11 | −0.23 | 0.02 | −0.21 | |
Austin et al., 2010 | 475 | AD | Distraction | T | EQ-i: S | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.37 | |
Lanciano et al., 2012 | 157 | AD | Dysfunctional rumination | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.44 | −0.56 | −0.30 | −0.98 |
Petrides et al., 2007b | 274 | AD | Trait rumination | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.47 | −0.56 | −0.38 | −1.06 | |
Petrides et al., 2007a (study 1) | 166 | AD | Trait rumination | T | modified EQ-i | −0.53 | −0.64 | −0.42 | −1.25 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | AD | Trait Rumination | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.10 | −0.24 | 0.04 | −0.20 | |
Ramos et al., 2007 | 144 | AD | State rumination | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.11 | −0.27 | 0.05 | −0.21 |
Salovey et al., 2002 (study 3) | 48 | AD | State rumination | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.27 | −0.51 | 0.02 | −0.55 |
Salguero et al., 2013 | 1154 | AD | Rumination | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.11 | −0.17 | −0.05 | −0.22 |
Brown and Ryan, 2003 | 645 | AD | Mindful attention | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.87 |
Wang and Kong, 2014 | 321 | AD | Mindful attention | T | WLEIS | 0.33 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.70 | |
Schutte and Malouff, 2011 | 125 | AD | Mindful attention | T | AES | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 1.71 | |
Kokinda, 2010 | 108 | AD | Mindful attention | T | AES | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 1.06 | |
Charoensukmongkol, 2014 | 317 | AD | Mindful attention | T | WLEIS | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.68 | |
Baer et al., 2004 (study 4) | 130 | AD | Mindful attention | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.40 | 0.49 |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | AD | Focus on positive | T | EIS | 0.46 | −0.01 | 0.79 | 1.03 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | CC | Cognitive change | T | AES | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.46 | 0.54 | |
Charoensukmongkol, 2014 | 317 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | WLEIS | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 1.86 | |
Brown et al., 2003 | 288 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EII-R | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.50 | |
Chan, 2004 | 158 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.66 | |
Martin et al., 2004 | 140 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EJI | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.65 | 1.27 | |
Durán et al., 2006 | 373 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.72 |
Kaur et al., 2006 | 117 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.92 | |
Villanueva and Sanchez, 2007 | 70 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | SSRI | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.54 | 0.77 | |
Di Fabio and Palazzeschi, 2008 | 169 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 0.72 | |
Adeyemo, 2007 | 300 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.34 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 95 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 1.75 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study1) | 27 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.75 | 1.15 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2) | 15 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.29 | −0.27 | 0.70 | 0.60 | |
Kirk et al., 2008 | 207 | CC | Self-efficaccy | T | AES | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 2.13 | |
Kirk et al., 2008 | 207 | CC | Self-efficaccy | A | MSCEIT | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.46 | 0.72 | |
Animasahun, 2008 | 300 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | EIS | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.95 | |
Salami, 2010a | 242 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | WLEIS | 0.08 | −0.05 | 0.21 | 0.16 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | SREIS | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 1.38 | |
Mouton et al., 2013 | 119 | CC | Self-efficacy | T | TEIQue | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.58 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b | 164 | CC | Core self-evaluationa | T | TEIQue/EQ-i | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 1.35 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014b | 164 | CC | Core self-evaluation | A | MSCEIT | 0.02 | −0.13 | 0.17 | 0.04 | |
Kluemper, 2008 | 180 | CC | Core self-evaluation | T | WLEIS | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 2.14 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a | 194 | CC | Self-Efficacy | A | MSCEIT | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.47 | |
Di Fabio and Saklofske, 2014a | 194 | CC | Self-Efficacy | T | EQ-i | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 1.80 | |
Mikolajczak and Luminet, 2008 (study2) | 15 | CC | Ratio challenge/threat | T | TEIQue-SF | 0.72 | 0.33 | 0.9 | 2.07 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 70 | CC | Challenge appraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.02 | −0.22 | 0.26 | 0.04 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2006 | 70 | CC | Threat appraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.41 | −0.60 | −0.20 | −0.89 | |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | CC | Reappraisal | T | AES | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.62 | 1.03 | |
Shah and Thingujam, 2008 | 197 | CC | Positive reappraisal | T | EIS | AGS | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.43 |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 1.03 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | CC | Positive reappraisal | T | TMMS-alex F1 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.47 | |
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007 | 475 | CC | Reappraisal | T | EQ-I | 0.04 | −0.08 | 0.16 | 0.08 | |
Cabello et al., 2013 | 866 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.72 |
Coumans, 2005 | 31 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.02 | −0.34 | 0.38 | 0.04 | |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | CC | Perspective taking | T | EIS | 0.21 | −0.29 | 0.62 | 0.43 | |
Moradi et al., 2011 | 200 | CC | Reappraisal | T | TMMS | R+C | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 1.01 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Positive interpretation | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Positive interpretation | A | MSCEIT | 0.11 | −0.02 | 0.24 | 0.21 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TMMS+AES | R+C | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.28 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Adaptive Humour | A | MSCEIT | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.01 | −0.10 | 0.12 | 0.02 |
Greven et al., 2008 | 1038 | CC | Adaptive Humour | T | TEIQue-LF | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.99 | |
Greven et al., 2008 | 1038 | CC | Maladaptive Humour | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.27 | −0.33 | −0.21 | −0.55 | |
Tsarenko and Strizhakova, 2013 | 252 | CC | Denial | T | SREIS | −0.09 | −0.21 | 0.03 | −0.18 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Denial | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.16 | −0.27 | −0.05 | −0.32 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Denial | T | TMMS+AES | −0.15 | −0.27 | −0.02 | −0.30 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Denial | A | MSCEIT | −0.20 | −0.32 | −0.08 | −0.41 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | CC | Acceptance | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | 0.09 | −0.02 | 0.20 | 0.17 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Acceptance | T | TMMS+AES | 0.38 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.82 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | CC | Acceptance | A | MSCEIT | 0.10 | −0.03 | 0.23 | 0.21 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2008 | 203 | CC | Acceptance | T | TEIQue-LF | −0.06 | −0.20 | 0.08 | −0.12 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Venting | T | TMMS+AES | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Venting | A | MSCEIT | 0.02 | −0.11 | 0.15 | 0.03 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | RM | Venting | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.27 | −0.37 | −0.16 | −0.56 |
Schutte et al., 2009 | 73 | RM | suppression (ERQ) | T | EIS | −0.50 | −0.66 | −0.31 | −1.15 | |
Johnson and Spector, 2007 | 176 | RM | Suppression | T | WLEIS | −0.08 | −0.23 | 0.07 | −0.16 | |
Austin et al., 2008 | 247 | RM | Suppression | T | TEIQue-SF | −0.45 | −0.55 | −0.35 | −1.01 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2007b | 124 | RM | Suppression | T | TEIQue-SF | −0.31 | −0.46 | −0.14 | −0.65 | |
Totterdell and Holman, 2003 | 18 | RM | Suppression | T | EIS | −0.18 | −0.60 | 0.31 | −0.36 | |
Velasco et al., 2006 | 593 | RM | Suppression | T | TMMS-alex F1 | −0.28 | −0.35 | −0.21 | −0.58 | |
Kafetsios and Loumakou, 2007 | 475 | RM | Suppression (ERQ) | T | EQ-I | −0.08 | −0.20 | 0.04 | −0.16 | |
Cabello et al., 2013 | 866 | RM | Suppression | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.13 | −0.20 | −0.06 | −0.26 |
Lee and Ok, 2012 | 309 | RM | Emotional dissonance | T | WLEIS | −0.22 | −0.33 | −0.11 | −0.45 | |
Rivers et al., 2013 | 243 | RM | Aggressive behavior | A | MSCEIT | −0.25 | −0.36 | −0.13 | −0.51 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Deviant behavior | A | MSCEIT | −0.27 | −0.37 | −0.17 | −0.56 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Social deviance | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.14 | −0.27 | 0.00 | −0.28 | |
Shahzad et al., 2013 | 140 | RM | Aggression | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.31 | −0.45 | −0.15 | −0.64 | |
Mikolajczak et al., 2009a | 490 | RM | Self-harm | T | TEIQue-ASF | −0.31 | −0.39 | −0.23 | −0.65 | |
Karim and Shah, 2014 | 192 | RM | Suicidal ideation | A | MSCEIT | AGS | −0.30 | −0.42 | −0.16 | −0.63 |
Aradilla-Herrero et al., 2014 | 93 | RM | Suicide risk | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.21 | −0.40 | −0.01 | −0.43 |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | T | MEIA | −0.22 | −0.34 | −0.10 | −0.45 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | A | MSCEIT | −0.07 | −0.20 | 0.06 | −0.14 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Binge eating | T | MEIA | −0.21 | −0.33 | −0.08 | −0.43 | |
Gardner et al., 2014 | 235 | RM | Binge eating | A | MSCEIT | −0.03 | −0.16 | 0.10 | −0.06 | |
Pettit et al., 2010 | 402 | RM | Bulimia/Food preocupation | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.13 | −0.23 | −0.03 | −0.26 |
Markey and Vander Wal, 2007 | 154 | RM | Bulimic symptoms | T | EQ- i:S | −0.31 | −0.45 | −0.16 | −0.65 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Illegal drug use | A | MSCEIT | −0.11 | −0.22 | 0.00 | −0.22 | |
Brackett et al., 2004 | 330 | RM | Alcohol use | A | MSCEIT | −0.13 | −0.24 | −0.02 | −0.26 | |
Rossen and Kranzler, 2009 | 150 | RM | Alcohol use | A | MSCEIT | −0.21 | −0.35 | −0.07 | −0.43 | |
Tsaousis and Nikolaou, 2005 | 365 | RM | Alcohol units | T | TEIQ | −0.07 | −0.17 | 0.03 | −0.14 | |
Austin et al., 2005 | 115 | RM | Acohol consumption | T | REIS | −0.19 | −0.37 | −0.01 | −0.38 | |
Ghee and Johnson, 2008 | 214 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.02 | −0.15 | 0.11 | −0.04 | |
Riley and Schutte, 2003 | 141 | RM | Acohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.34 | −0.48 | −0.2 | −0.72 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.13 | −0.26 | 0.01 | −0.26 | |
Trinidad and Johnson, 2002 | 205 | RM | Alcohol consumption | A | MEIS | −0.12 | −0.26 | 0.01 | −0.25 | |
Saklofske et al., 2007 | 362 | RM | Alcohol consumption | T | EIS | −0.05 | −0.15 | 0.05 | −0.10 | |
Brackett and Mayer, 2003 | 207 | RM | Illegal drug user scale | T | EQ-i/SREIT | −0.14 | −0.27 | −0.003 | −0.28 | |
Riley and Schutte, 2003 | 141 | RM | Drug abuse | T | EIS | −0.42 | −0.55 | −0.29 | −0.92 | |
Limonero et al., 2006 | 133 | RM | Canabis smoking | T | TMMS | R+C | −0.01 | −0.19 | 0.16 | −0.02 |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Substance use | T | TMMS+AES | −0.05 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −0.10 | |
Bastian et al., 2005 | 246 | RM | Substance use | A | MSCEIT | −0.02 | −0.14 | 0.11 | −0.03 | |
Rivers et al., 2013 | 243 | RM | Substance abuse | A | MSCEIT | −0.18 | −0.31 | −0.06 | −0.36 | |
Schutte et al., 2011 | 100 | RM | Alcohol problems | A | MSCEIT | −0.30 | −0.46 | −0.11 | −0.63 | |
Schutte et al., 2011 | 100 | RM | Alcohol problems | T | AES | −0.27 | −0.45 | −0.08 | −0.56 | |
Zomer, 2012 | 300 | RM | Drugs | T | TMMS-24 | R+C | −0.11 | −0.22 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
Monaci et al., 2013 | 198 | RM | Alcohol use | T | SEIS | −0.05 | −0.19 | 0.09 | −0.10 | |
Solanki and Lane, 2010 | 315 | RM | Exercise mood regulating | T | EIS | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 1.01 |
SS, Situation Selection; SM, Situation Modification; AD, Attentional Deployment; CC, Cognitive Change; RM, Response Modulation; T/A, Trait or Ability EI measure: T, trait EI measure, A, ability EI measure; AGS, Aggregated Global Score; R+C, Repair + Clarity; AES, Assessing Emotions Scale; EIS, Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-i/YV/S, Emotional Quotient Inventory/Young Version/Short; WLEIS, The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIT, Self Report Emotional Intelligence Test; TMMS-24, Trait Meta Mood Scale; TEIQ, The Traits Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire; TEIQue/SF/LF/ASF, Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire/ Short-Form/Long-Form/Adolescent Short-Form; MSCEIT, The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test; SEIS, Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale; SREIS, Self-Reported Emotional Intelligence Scale; EQ-Index, Emotional Quotient Index; WEIP6, Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile-Version 6; EII-R, Emotional Intelligence Inventory Revised; MEIS, Multifactoral Emotional Intelligence Scale; EJI, Emotional Judgment Inventory; SSRI, Schutte Self-Report Inventory; MEIA, Multidimensional Emotional Intelligence Assessment; REIS, Revised Emotional Intelligence Scale; SEI, Survey of Emotional Intelligence. JET, Judgment of Emotions Test; IJI, Interpersonal Judgment Inventory; STEU, Situational Test of Emotional Understanding.
*The forecast accuracy indices were calculated such that higher numbers indicate poorer accuracy.
The core self-evaluation construct is a fundamental part of self-evaluated values, efficacy and abilities. It includes self-esteem, self-efficacy, internal locus of control and absence of pessimism.