Table 5.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (top) and Spearman’s correlation coefficients (bottom) of the attentional effects (in RT) across the VS, AS, and AF tasks.
| VS and AS | VS and AF | AS and AF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson | |||
| Overall RT | 0.53∗∗ | 0.63∗∗ | 0.70∗∗ |
| Alerting | -0.06 | -0.2 | 0.14 |
| Orienting | -0.04a | 0.03 | -0.22a |
| Validity | 0.22a | -0.14 | 0.03a |
| Conflict | 0.17 | 0.32∗ | 0.67∗∗ |
| A × C | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| O × C | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| V × C | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| Spearman | |||
| Overall RT | 0.53∗∗ | 0.58∗∗ | 0.67∗∗ |
| Alerting | -0.08 | -0.36 | 0.10 |
| Orienting | -0.01 | 0.06 | -0.21 |
| Validity | 0.33∗ | -0.16 | -0.02 |
| Conflict | 0.28∗ | 0.45∗∗ | 0.61∗∗ |
| A × C | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
| O × C | -0.11 | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| V × C | 0.01 | -0.07 | 0.08 |
A × C, Alerting by Conflict; O × C, Orienting by Conflict; V × C, Validity by Conflict; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. aThe orienting and validity effects in the ANT-AS were not significant. Interpretations about correlations between these effects and other effects should be made with caution.