Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 24;3:18. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00018

Table 2.

Confusion matrix computed by applying InosinePredict (Eggington et al., 2011) to our dataset.

Prediction outcome
Editing site Non-editing site
Actual value Editing sites 58.48 41.52
Random sites 60.18 39.82

Editing percentages for each sites have been divided into two classes (editing/non-editing) using the thresholds defined in Eggington et al. (2011).