Table 2.
Confusion matrix computed by applying InosinePredict (Eggington et al., 2011) to our dataset.
Prediction outcome |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Editing site | Non-editing site | ||
Actual value | Editing sites | 58.48 | 41.52 |
Random sites | 60.18 | 39.82 |
Editing percentages for each sites have been divided into two classes (editing/non-editing) using the thresholds defined in Eggington et al. (2011).