TABLE 2.
Origin and gene | Lineage | Global dN/dS |
Branch model dN/dS |
Sites under positive selectiona | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | 95% CId |
|||||||
Lower | Upper | External | Internal | Internal/external ratio | ||||
Avian | ||||||||
HA | Human H2N2 | 0.448 | 0.402 | 0.497 | 0.287 | 0.272 | 0.948 | 5 (S72R/I; N181I; N192D/E/K; E211K/D; K217Eb) |
Avian H2N2 | 0.120 | 0.110 | 0.129 | 0.114 | 0.062 | 0.538 | ||
NA | Human H2N2 | 0.347 | 0.295 | 0.405 | 0.324 | 0.330 | 1.020 | |
Avian H2N2 | 0.170 | 0.158 | 0.182 | 0.473 | 0.210 | 0.444 | ||
PB1 | Human H2N2 | 0.130 | 0.106 | 0.158 | 0.068 | 0.054 | 0.794 | |
Avian H2N2 | 0.031 | 0.028 | 0.035 | 0.111 | 0.080 | 0.723 | ||
Human | ||||||||
PB2 | H2N2 | 0.116 | 0.094 | 0.142 | 0.067 | 0.045 | 0.671 | |
H1N1 | 0.072 | 0.061 | 0.083 | 0.079 | 0.052 | 0.655 | ||
PA | H2N2 | 0.147 | 0.119 | 0.179 | 0.112 | 0.098 | 0.871 | |
H1N1 | 0.085 | 0.074 | 0.097 | 0.076 | 0.066 | 0.880 | ||
NP | H2N2 | 0.221 | 0.181 | 0.267 | 0.133 | 0.123 | 0.924 | |
H1N1 | 0.165 | 0.132 | 0.204 | 0.166 | 0.104 | 0.627 | ||
M1 | H2N2 | 0.224 | 0.167 | 0.291 | 0.161 | 0.083 | 0.513 | |
H1N1 | 0.128 | 0.105 | 0.154 | 0.157 | 0.073 | 0.467 | ||
M2c | H2N2 | 0.309 | 0.187 | 0.475 | 0.163 | 0.115 | 0.708 | |
H1N1 | 0.405 | 0.322 | 0.502 | 0.534 | 0.435 | 0.814 | ||
NS1 | H2N2 | 0.500 | 0.398 | 0.618 | 0.406 | 0.321 | 0.790 | |
H1N1 | 0.287 | 0.251 | 0.326 | 0.281 | 0.239 | 0.852 | ||
NS2c | H2N2 | 0.300 | 0.200 | 0.428 | 0.371 | 0.569 | 1.534 | |
H1N1 | 0.215 | 0.170 | 0.268 | 0.182 | 0.192 | 1.053 |
Only sites that were significant in both the MEME method, with a P cutoff of <0.05, and the Tdg09 method, with a false discovery rate cutoff of <0.05, are reported.
Letters refer to single-letter amino acid abbreviations.
The MP and NS comprise two open reading frames with partial overlap, giving rise to two gene products of significant length. Selection pressures reflected in the overlapping part in either gene segment cannot be attributed to one of the two open reading frames, and the reported dN/dS values should be interpreted with caution.
CI, confidence interval.