Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Dev. 2009 Feb 1;18(1):181–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00483.x

Table 8. Proportion of Justifications for the Retaliation Assessment by Scenario.

Justification by Scenario
Aggression Distribution of Resources
Moral Pros S-Con Retrib Moral Pros S-Con Retrib
Displaced
6 yr-old .27 .11 .09 .31 .42 .14 .11 .20
(.44) (.30) (.30) (.47) (.49) (.34) (.30) (.40)
9 yr-old .37 .23 .18 .19 .44 .26 .27 .03
(.48) (.42) (.38) (.40) (.50) (.44) (.44) (.18)
12 yr-old .23 .32 .06 .32 .48 .27 .15 .10
(.40) (.48) (.21) (.48) (.47) (.44) (.32) (.30)
Total .29 .22 .11 .28 .45 .22 .18 .11
(.44) (.41) (.30) (.45) (.48) (.41) (.36) (.31)
Non-Displaced
6 yr-old .32 .19 .18 .23 .59 .13 .17 .09
(.47) (.39) (.39) (.43) (.48) (.32) (.37) (.28)
9 yr-old .30 .37 .27 .07 .45 .33 .15 .00
(.46) (.49) (.45) (.25) (.50) (.48) (.35) (.00)
12 yr-old .17 .50 .20 .13 .22 .63 .03 .07
(.38) (.51) (.41) (.35) (.41) (.47) (.18) (.25)
Total .27 .34 .22 .15 .43 .34 .12 .06
(.44) (.47) (.41) (.36) (.49) (.47) (.32) (.22)
Total .28 .28 .16 .22 .44 .28 .15 .08
(.44) (.45) (.37) (.41) (.48) (.44) (.34) (.27)

Note. N = 193. Displaced N = 94. Non-Displaced N = 99. Proportions cannot exceed 1.00. Standard deviations are in parenthesis. Pros = Prosocial. S-Con = Social-Conventional. Retrib = Retribution.