Table 6.
Item | Average score | Measure | SE | Infit | Outfit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 [It cares of individual residents] | 2.8 | 1.54 | .22 | .98 | .98 |
13 [Systems of evaluation] | 2.9 | 1.29 | .23 | .95 | 1.01 |
3 [It provides opportunities of confrontation…] | 3.1 | .84 | .23 | .82 | .82 |
12 [Quality score of the formal lessons] | 3.1 | .84 | .23 | 1.41 | 1.35 |
7 [Actions to improve the quality of training] | 3.2 | .61 | .23 | .92 | 1.02 |
6[Professional guidance] | 3.3 | .52 | .24 | 1.02 | 1.04 |
2[Rotation plan] | 3.3 | .41 | .24 | 1.13 | 1.20 |
9 [Quality score of the rotations] | 3.4 | .07 | .24 | 1.13 | 1.18 |
15 [Overall judgment] | 3.6 | -.50 | .26 | .55 | .54 |
8 [Overall quality of the training] | 3.7 | -.68 | .26 | .72 | .65 |
11 [Quality score of the cultural environment] | 3.8 | −1.10 | .27 | 1.04 | .92 |
1 [Formal lectures plan] | 3.9 | −1.48 | .28 | 1.04 | .97 |
10 [Autonomy and reliability] | 4.1 | −2.37 | .29 | 1.16 | 1.13 |
Note. Greater measures indicate more difficult items (i.e., that received fewer positive evaluations).