Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12868-015-0143-9

Table 3.

Summary of naming errors induced by rTMS

Error category Object naming Pseudoword reading Verb generation Action naming
5 Hz 7 Hz p 5 Hz 7 Hz p 5 Hz 7 Hz p 5 Hz 7 Hz p
No response 1.6% 3.5% 0.001 0.0% 0.0% >0.999 1.6% 2.4% 0.015 1.8% 1.9% 0.908
Hesitations 9.9% 7.2% 0.002 1.5% 1.1% 0.213 9.5% 6.7% <0.001 7.8% 5.5% 0.004
Performance 1.3% 0.8% 0.112 0.8% 0.8% 0.952 1.0% 0.6% 0.307 0.6% 0.5% 0.692
Phonological 0.2% 0.0% 0.125 1.6% 1.4% 0.435 0.4% 0.2% 0.075 0.4% 0.3% 0.677
Semantic 0.6% 0.4% 0.357 0.0% 0.0% -- 0.3% 0.3% >0.999 0.3% 0.2% 0.774
Neologism 0.0% 0.0% >0.999 0.0% 0.0% >0.999 0.1% 0.0% 0.250 0.0% 0.0% >0.999
Nominalization 0.0% 0.0% -- 0.0% 0.0% -- 0.6% 0.3% 0.364 0.2% 0.2% >0.999
All errors 13.7% 11.5% 0.021 4.0% 3.2% 0.202 13.5% 10.6% 0.002 11.1% 8.5% 0.005

Naming error rates of each error type in four tested language tasks and for both applied frequencies. Differences among distribution of error rates per stimulation point in different mapping frequencies were tested by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test; respective p values were presented.