Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 17;27(2):371–374. doi: 10.1589/jpts.272.371

Table 2. Comparison of foot progression angle, weight- bearing ratio, and knee adduction moment within groups and between groups.

Parameters Values

PTG (n=12) QSG (n=13) CG (n=12)



pre post pre post pre post
Foot progression angle (°) Loading response 9.84 (4.86) 11.84 (3.96) * 8.02 (5.03) 7.34 (5.90) 9.00 (7.83) 8.51 (6.01)
Terminal stance 10.33 (4.52) 11.11 (3.79) 10.23 (5.78) 9.54 (6.99) 10.21 (8.45) 9.43 (6.21)
Weight-bearing ratio (%) 31.00 (10.16) 43.67 (14.51) * 35.43 (9.60) 36.28 (9.99) 30.14 (3.84) 29.14 (3.72)
Knee adduction moment (Nm/kg) First peak 0.57 (0.20) 0.44 (0.22) * 0.54 (0.15) 0.50 (0.12) 0.53 (0.03) 0.53 (0.12)
Second peak 0.49 (0.26) 0.43 (0.28) * 0.47 (0.14) 0.41 (0.11) 0.44 (0.14) 0.52 (0.06)

Values are means (SD). *Within-group difference (p<0.05). †Significantly greater than the CG (post hoc test). PTG: proprioceptive training group; QSG: quadriceps strengthening group; CG: control group