Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 24;10(2):e0117146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117146

Table 4. The specific number of studies included and basic characteristics of treatments for each intervention.

Intervention Condition Study (N) Patients (N) Duration of one treatment (minutes)$ Treatment sessions (times)$ Course of Treatment (weeks)$ Number of acupoints selected$
Acupuncture NP 17 1434 25 (20, 30) 8.5 (5.8, 10.5) 4 (3, 4.5) 6 (5.8, 10)
LBP 31 6656 25 (20, 30) 10 (6, 12) 4.5 (3.3, 7) 9.8 (6, 14)
Acupressure NP 1 32 35–40 8 3 7
LBP 5 417 15 or 30 8 (6, 9) 4 (3, 4) 7 or 18
Cupping NP 5 251 10 or 15 5 (4, 6) 2 n.a.
LBP 6 415 15 or 20 7.5 (3.5, 10) 3 (1.9, 3) n.a.
Gua sha NP 2 69 15 or 30 1 n.a.
LBP 1 19 15 1 n.a.
Qi gong NP 3 378 60 (45, 90) 18 (12, 18) 12 n.a.
LBP 0 0
Tai chi NP 0 0
LBP 1 170 40 18 10 n.a.
Chinese herbal medicine NP 3 840 n.a. 8 (8, 12) 4
LBP 0 0
Chinese manipulation NP 3 396 20 8 (8, 10) 4 (4, 5) n.a.
LBP 0 0
Moxibustion NP 0 0
LBP 0 0
Tuina NP 0 0
LBP 0 0
Total 75* 11077

LBP, low back pain; NP, neck pain; N, number; RCT, randomized controlled trial; n.a., not applicable.

*Some of the studies were included into two or more rows.

$The results were shown as median and interquartile range.