Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3625–3643. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3388-14.2015

Table 4.

Comparison of efferent-mediated excitation in calyx versus dimorphic afferents

Unit n Normalized coefficient of variationa Background discharge (sp/s)a Peak exitation (sp/s)b Mean T100 (sp/s)c Half-width (s)d Duration (s)e
Calyxf 29 0.7621 ± 0.0267 19.3 ± 2.0* 61.8 ± 4.4* 54.7 ± 4.3* 0.383 ± 0.023 1.071 ± 0.058*
Dimorphicf 29 0.7061 ± 0.0235 25.7 ± 2.3 46.9 ± 3.1 40.1 ± 2.9 0.477 ± 0.040 1.376 ± 0.071

aNormalized coefficient of variation and background discharge were calculated from 5 s α period devoid of any efferent stimulus.

bPeak excitation was taken from the first 50 ms bin of the average response histogram.

cMean efferent-mediated excitation during the first 100 ms interval immediately following the efferent shock train (20 shocks at 200/s).

dTime it took the response to return to half the peak excitation.

eTime it took the response to return to background.

fStatistical test for unit response properties, unpaired t test for calyx versus dimorphic. For all statistical tests, asterisks indicate level of significance:

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.