Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Feb 6;55(2):407–420. doi: 10.1021/ci500691p

Table 6.

AUCs using RMSD, SP LGFE and SILCS-MC sampled LGFE for ranking for the eight targets. D%a is the percentage of different active ligands in the top 10% ranked compounds identified by LGFE score that were not identified by RMSD score are also shown.

Ranking score HIVPR FXa DHFR FGFr1 P38 MAP ADA ER AmpC
AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a AUC D%a
RMSD 0.78 - 0.91 - 0.79 - 0.55 - 0.57 - 0.80 - 0.81 - 0.70 -
SP LGFE 0.54 4 0.78 8 0.67 9 0.75 14 0.75 43 0.58 4 0.86 46 0.55 0
MC LGFE 0.49 2 0.90 17 0.70 6 0.66 13 0.73 30 0.64 0 0.83 41 0.62 0
a

D%=Ndiff/Nligands*100%, where Ndiff is the number of active ligands identified by LGFE score among the top 10% LGFE ranked compounds that are not found by RMSD score among the top 10% RMSD ranked compounds, and Nligands are the total number of active ligands in the database for the target.