Table III.
Predictors | Model A8 Bivariate Model β (p-value) | Model B9 Multivariable Model β (p-value) | Model C Multivariable Model β (p-value) |
---|---|---|---|
Intercept | ---- | 1.30 (<0.0005) | 1.36 (<0.0005) |
Number of months since baseline | −0.03 (0.002) | −0.03 (0.06) | −0.03 (0.07) |
Number of months since relocation | 0.03 (0.03) | 0.03 (0.11) | 0.03 (0.13) |
Individual Characteristics | |||
Gender | −0.30 (0.02) | −0.13 (0.22) | −0.12 (0.26) |
Age | −0.02 (< 0.0005) | −0.02 (< 0.0005) | −0.02 (< 0.0005) |
Married | −0.46 (0.04) | −0.43 (0.02) | −0.43 (0.02) |
High School diploma/GED | −0.07 (0.58) | ---- | ---- |
Household income | −0.004 (0.86) | ---- | ---- |
HIV positive | 0.78 (<0.0005) | 0.87 (< 0.0005) | 0.85 (< 0.0005) |
Drug dependence | 0.27 (0.03) | ---- | ---- |
Binge drinking 2 or more times/month | 0.05 (0.64) | ---- | ---- |
Illegal drug use >1–3 times/month | 0.32 (0.002) | ---- | ---- |
Place Characteristics | |||
Economic disadvantage | |||
- baseline | 0.20 (0.07) | 0.04 (0.66) | |
- change since baseline | 0.11 (0.06) | 0.10 (0.09) | |
Sex ratio (ref group=equity) | |||
More women | −0.34 (0.01) | −0.30 (0.02) | −0.33 (0.01) |
More men | −0.50 (0.03) | −0.47 (0.03) | −0.39 (0.07) |
Social disorder | |||
- baseline | −0.08 (0.17) | ||
- change since baseline | 0.003 (0.95) | ||
Alcohol density | |||
-baseline | −0.02 (0.10) | ||
-change since baseline | −0.002 (0.78) | ||
Violent crime rate (per 1000) | |||
- baseline | −0.006 (0.89) | 0.002 (0.58) | |
- change since baseline | 0.004 (0.13) | 0.006 (0.03) | |
Perceived community violence | |||
- baseline | 0.09 (0.002) | 0.05 (0.06) | 0.05 (0.08) |
- change since baseline | 0.04 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.23) | 0.03 (0.31) |
Variance components | |||
Intercept (community) | ----- | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Intercept (individual) | ----- | 0.43 | 0.44 |
Drug-related covariates were not included in the final models because they might lie in the causal pathway linking place characteristics to perceived partner risk.
Bivariate models tested the relationship between each individual-level and census-tract level predictor and the outcome, controlling for the number of months since baseline and the number of months since relocation.
Because our measures of tract-level economic conditions were associated with our measures of tract-level violent crime rates, we ran two separate multivariable models, one for each of these predictors.