Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 24;13(2):e1002073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073

Fig 3. Bayesian Causal Inference model and cortical hierarchies.

Fig 3

(A) Participants were presented with auditory and visual spatial signals. We recorded participants’ psychophysical localization responses and fMRI BOLD responses. (B) The Bayesian Causal Inference model [2] was fitted to participants’ localization responses and then used to obtain four spatial estimates for each condition: the unisensory auditory (ŜA,C=2) and visual (ŜV,C=2) estimates under full segregation (C = 2), the forced-fusion estimate (ŜAV,C=1) under full integration (C = 1), and the final spatial estimate (ŜA, ŜV) that averages the task-relevant unisensory and the forced-fusion estimate weighted by the posterior probability of each causal structure (i.e., for a common source: p(C = 1|xA, xV) or independent sources: 1 − p(C = 1|xA, xV). (C) fMRI voxel response patterns were obtained from regions along the visual and auditory hierarchies (V, visual sensory regions; A1, primary auditory cortex; hA, higher auditory area; IPS, intraparietal sulcus). (D) Exceedance probabilities index the belief that a given spatial estimate is more likely represented within a region of interest than any other spatial estimate. The exceedance probabilities for the different spatial estimates are indexed in the length of the colored areas of each bar (n.b. the y-axis indicates the cumulative exceedance probabilities). The data used to make this figure are available in file S1 Data.